2022
DOI: 10.1007/s12205-022-1924-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of Primary Failure Modes of Tunnel System and Influence of Supporting Structures on Tunnel System Reliability using Multiple Response Surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The key to the response surface function is to determine the 2mþ1constants. Following the research studies (Zhang et al, 2011;Liu et al, 2023b), 2mþ1sampling points are carefully designed to cover the potential random variable spaces. The yield acceleration of sampling points is calculated using the pseudo-static limit equilibrium method and is equated with k yi (X) obtained by Eq.…”
Section: The Identification Of Rssmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The key to the response surface function is to determine the 2mþ1constants. Following the research studies (Zhang et al, 2011;Liu et al, 2023b), 2mþ1sampling points are carefully designed to cover the potential random variable spaces. The yield acceleration of sampling points is calculated using the pseudo-static limit equilibrium method and is equated with k yi (X) obtained by Eq.…”
Section: The Identification Of Rssmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The verification of response surface function. Before the calibrated RSF can be adopted to predict k y at unsampled points, it should be verified by comparing the predictions with those from pseudo-static limit equilibrium methods (Liu et al, 2023b;Ma and Liu, 2022). The verification steps are as follows:…”
Section: 32mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In order to improve the computational efficiency of MCS simulation, surrogate models have been developed to establish the relationship between the random variables and the response of geotechnical structures (e.g., the relationship between soil strength parameters and slope sliding displacement). The developed surrogate models within the literature include but not limited to response surface method (RSM), [31][32][33][34][35] artificial neural network (ANN), 36,37 support vector machine (SVM), 38,39 multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS), 40 random forest (RF), [41][42][43] convolutional neural network (CNN). Response surface method is widely used in slope reliability analysis due to its simplicity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%