2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.02.03.479047
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of putative enhancer-like elements predicts regulatory networks active in planarian adult stem cells

Abstract: Planarians have become an established model system to study regeneration and stem cells, but the regulatory elements in the genome remain almost entirely undescribed. Here, by integrating epigenetic and expression data we use multiple sources of evidence to identify enhancer elements active in the adult stem cell populations that drive regeneration. We have used ChIP-seq data to identify regions with histone modifications consistent with enhancer identity and activity, and ATAC-seq data to identify accessible … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 190 publications
(231 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We ran Orthofinder using a proteome from a new planarian annotation to isolate the orthologues of each predicted gene 48,49 . To reduce redundancy, we first ran CD-hits to collapse all peptides with 99% identity to a single transcript ID (supplementary data 4).…”
Section: Defining Orthologuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We ran Orthofinder using a proteome from a new planarian annotation to isolate the orthologues of each predicted gene 48,49 . To reduce redundancy, we first ran CD-hits to collapse all peptides with 99% identity to a single transcript ID (supplementary data 4).…”
Section: Defining Orthologuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, if a mutation is homozygous in all libraries supporting the mutation, it will have a homozygosity score of 1 and vice versa. To verify that the homozygosity score does not represent biased gene expression rather than homozygosity, we compared SNPs found in both RNAseq data to available ATAC (genomic) data 49 . This showed that when filtering for mutations supported by over 3 libraries, there is over 95% agreement between RNAseq and ATAC based methods of calling purely homozygous variants (supplementary figure 1).…”
Section: Analysis Of Zygositymentioning
confidence: 99%