2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00122-020-03730-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of QTL for resistance to leaf blast in foxtail millet by genome re-sequencing analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nuclear DNA markers, such as microsatellites (SSRs) [ 12 ], randomly amplified polymorphic DNA markers [ 13 ], and chloroplast DNA [ 14 ] have been used to detect introgression across species. With advancements in genomic studies, our understanding of the ecological, genetic, and genomic factors underlying the diverse outcomes of interspecific introgression in hybrid zones is increasing [ 15 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nuclear DNA markers, such as microsatellites (SSRs) [ 12 ], randomly amplified polymorphic DNA markers [ 13 ], and chloroplast DNA [ 14 ] have been used to detect introgression across species. With advancements in genomic studies, our understanding of the ecological, genetic, and genomic factors underlying the diverse outcomes of interspecific introgression in hybrid zones is increasing [ 15 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large number of molecular markers have been developed and utilized, including single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), indels, structural variants, simple-sequence repeats (SSRs), and Expressed Sequence Tag-SSRs [13][14][15][16][17]. The rapid development of sequencing technology in recent years allowed large-scale wholegenome sequencing becoming possible, and further facilitate numbers of quantitative trait loci (QTL) related to agronomic traits being mapped in S. italica, which largely accelerate the molecular breeding process of millet [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, increasing sequencing depth rather than marker density (beyond 0.2 per cM) seems to enable greater gains in power of QTL detection in NGS-based BSA studies [ 46 ]. Thus, an efficient strategy could consist in exploiting deep sequencing of genetic libraries representing a reduced part of the genome [ 18 , 46 48 ] or targeting the transcriptome [ 28 , 44 , 49 , 50 ] of contrasted bulks. In the counterbalance between bulk size and coverage, favouring larger bulk sizes to the detriment of the depth of sequencing may lead to greater power of detection of QTLs [ 51 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%