2019
DOI: 10.1080/07350015.2019.1665532
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of Random Resource Shares in Collective Households Without Preference Similarity Restrictions

Abstract: Resource shares, defined as the fraction of total household spending going to each person in a household, are important for assessing individual material well-being, inequality and poverty. They are difficult to identify because consumption is measured typically at the household level, and many goods are jointly consumed, so that individual-level consumption in multi-person households is not directly observed. We consider random resource shares, which vary across observationally identical households. We provid… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
23
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Under independence of scale and the additional assumption that the parents’ preferences regarding their own consumption do not depend on the number of children, they obtain full identification. In Dunbar, Lewbel, and Pendakur (2014), the same authors show an even stronger result. They find that, in the presence of a distribution factor, independence of scale guarantees full identification even without assumptions on preferences.…”
Section: Tests Identification and Estimation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Under independence of scale and the additional assumption that the parents’ preferences regarding their own consumption do not depend on the number of children, they obtain full identification. In Dunbar, Lewbel, and Pendakur (2014), the same authors show an even stronger result. They find that, in the presence of a distribution factor, independence of scale guarantees full identification even without assumptions on preferences.…”
Section: Tests Identification and Estimation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Dunbar et al (2013) does not accommodate unobserved heterogeneity in resource shares. Two newer papers, Chiappori and Kim (2017) and Dunbar et al (2019) consider identification in cross-sectional data with unobserved household-level heterogeneity in resource shares. Like Chiappori and Kim (2017) and Theorem 1 in Dunbar et al (2019), our work investigates identification of the distribution of resource shares up to an unknown normalization.…”
Section: Microeconomic Models Of Collective Householdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such so-called distribution factors can improve estimates and even aid identification (e.g. in Browning et al, 1994;Dunbar et al, 2017). Under these and some additional technical conditions, BCL show that household demand for a good k can be written in budget share form as:…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%