2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41591-019-0457-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of rare-disease genes using blood transcriptome sequencing and large control cohorts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
279
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 256 publications
(294 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
3
279
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As the baseline for our approach, we used a simple beta-binomial 12 distribution (BB) with no correction for existing covariation and the parameters and were 13 estimated with the R package VGAM. 49 Further, we implemented a Z score approach similar to 14 the approach described by Frésard et al 16 Instead of regressing out the top principal 15 components accounting for 95% of the variation within the data, we used the top loadings of the 16 PCA maximizing the precision-recall of in silico injected splicing outliers and computed the Z 17 scores according to Equation (16). Finally, we implemented the Leafcutter 18 approach described 18 by Kremer et al, 15 where one sample is compared against all others within the dataset and no 19 control for latent sources of sample covariation is considered.…”
Section: (Equation 16) 18mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As the baseline for our approach, we used a simple beta-binomial 12 distribution (BB) with no correction for existing covariation and the parameters and were 13 estimated with the R package VGAM. 49 Further, we implemented a Z score approach similar to 14 the approach described by Frésard et al 16 Instead of regressing out the top principal 15 components accounting for 95% of the variation within the data, we used the top loadings of the 16 PCA maximizing the precision-recall of in silico injected splicing outliers and computed the Z 17 scores according to Equation (16). Finally, we implemented the Leafcutter 18 approach described 18 by Kremer et al, 15 where one sample is compared against all others within the dataset and no 19 control for latent sources of sample covariation is considered.…”
Section: (Equation 16) 18mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This benchmark also shows that FRASER 4 outperforms both state-of-the-art methods, which are the Leafcutter based approach 15 and the z 5 score based approach. 16 PCA controlled splicing metrics (x-axis). In every panel, the enrichment for each of the 48 GTEx tissues 13 is equal or higher for FRASER (points above the diagonal line).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical RNA-seq is one approach by which laboratories can identify splicing aberrations among other changes to the transcriptomes. Previous work in several labs have demonstrated that RNA-seq can enable genetic diagnosis in patients previously unsolved by exome or genome sequencing [13][14][15][16][17][18] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several recent studies consider limitations of using RNA-seq from CATs for clinical diagnosis. Frésard et al 2019 demonstrate that RNA-seq in whole blood can make some diagnoses in patients from diverse disease categories 16 . However, Cummings et al 2017, studying a cohort of patients with neuromuscular disease, perform RNA-seq on skeletal muscle biopsies motivated by low gene expression of many known neuromuscular disease genes in whole blood and fibroblasts 13 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mutations that alter mRNA splicing are known to lead to many human monogenic diseases including spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), cystic fibrosis (CF), familial dysautonomia (FD), Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) and myotonic dystrophy (DM), as well as contribute to complex diseases such as cancer and diabetes [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] . The emergence of high throughput sequencing of large disease cohorts [19][20][21] , and the remarkable efforts to aggregate and annotate these mutations in an accessible infrastructure such as ClinVar 22 , now provides an unprecedented opportunity to apply novel deep learning approaches to predict mutations that affect pre-mRNA splicing 23 . The potential of developing such models will continue to increase as next generation transcriptome sequencing (RNASeq) data are amassed and curation of the associated mutational processes matures [23][24][25][26] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%