1996
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.271.33.19656
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of Residues of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Proximal to Residue 45 of Bound Epidermal Growth Factor

Abstract: A triple mutant of murine epidermal growth factor (mEGF), N1Q/H22Y/R45K-mEGF, was constructed by site-directed mutagenesis, expressed, purified, and characterized for use in an affinity cross-linking study to identify aminoacyl residues of the EGF receptor adjacent to a residue in the carboxyl-terminal domain of bound EGF thought to be important in distinguishing between EGF and transforming growth factor-␣ in their recognition by the receptor. Cyclization of Gln 1 to form pyroglutamate (pE) limited the site o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
23
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This bivalence model attributes formation of homo-and heterodimers to NDF isoform-speci®c selectivity of site 2 (Pinkas- Kramarski et al, 1996a). Two recent studies support relevance of a similar bivalence model to EGF: First, a nity labeling identi®ed two binding sites on ErbB-1, each located at the other side of the N-terminal cysteine-rich domain of this receptor, and interacts with one terminus of the ligand (Summer®eld et al, 1996). Second, all possible stoichiometries of EGF : ErbB-1 were measured in solution, but the predominant ratio determined was 2 : 2 (Lemmon et al, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This bivalence model attributes formation of homo-and heterodimers to NDF isoform-speci®c selectivity of site 2 (Pinkas- Kramarski et al, 1996a). Two recent studies support relevance of a similar bivalence model to EGF: First, a nity labeling identi®ed two binding sites on ErbB-1, each located at the other side of the N-terminal cysteine-rich domain of this receptor, and interacts with one terminus of the ligand (Summer®eld et al, 1996). Second, all possible stoichiometries of EGF : ErbB-1 were measured in solution, but the predominant ratio determined was 2 : 2 (Lemmon et al, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…According to the model structure (see Fig. 7A), His 394 -Ile 402 occur on the opposite side of the L2 domain putatively involved in EGF binding as evidenced by cross-linking experiments (55). This additional evidence suggests that His 394 -Ile 402 may not play a direct interacting role with EGF but are nevertheless likely to be important for the overall local conformation of L2.…”
Section: Fig 6 Decorin and Egf Bind To A Finite Region Within The Lmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In addition, this face contains Lys 465 (Fig. 6B), an amino acid that can be cross-linked to EGF (55). Although in the deletion mutant ⌬9 the top third of L2, which is closely associated with the hydrophobic patch of amino acids, was missing, there was still full EGF/EGFR and decorin/ EGFR interaction.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The final monomeric structures were then obtained by running the CHARMm energy minimization in the Residue Topology File mode. To construct a dimeric erbB1⅐EGF model, the following assumptions were made based on the existing experimental evidence: erbB1⅐EGF complex has a 2:2 stoichiometry (32,33); the C-terminal part of subdomain IV is a dimeric interaction site (based on our results described below); the N terminus of bound EGF is close (within about 15 Å) to Tyr-101 (subdomain I) of erbB1 (34); the C-terminal Arg-45 of bound EGF is close (within about 15 Å) to Lys-465 (subdomain III) of erbB1 (35); the N terminus of EGF bound to erbB1 is about 67 Å (from 52 to 82 Å) away from the membrane surface (36); maximal dimensions of erbB1 are about 110 Å for the monomer and 120 Å for the dimer (32); EGF binds to the second face of subdomain III (37). Orientations of complex-forming two erbB1 and two EGF (Protein Data Bank code, 3EGF) molecules were adjusted manually to satisfy the criteria listed above based on two different models of the complex arrangement (see "Discussion").…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%