2023
DOI: 10.1111/asj.13864
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of selection signatures in Capra hircus and Capra aegagrus in Iran

Abstract: Identification of selection signatures may provide a better understanding of domestication process and candidate genes contributing to this process. In this study, two populations of domestic and wild goats from Iran were analyzed to identify selection signatures. RSB, iHS, and XP‐EHH statistics were used in order to identify robust selection signatures in the goat genome. Genotype data of domestic and wild goats from the NextGen project was used. The data was related to 18 Capra aegagrus (wild goat) and 20 Ca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PLINK V 1.9 (Purcell et al, 2007) was used for further filtering for both datasets (derived from this study and the publicly available data). Individuals with a genotyping call rate < 99%, SNPs with a genotyping call rate < 99%, and those exhibiting significant deviations from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (P-value <10 -6 ) were excluded from the analysis (Taheri et al, 2023). Following this filtering process, the genetic data from both groups were combined, and only the SNPs that were common to both groups were selected.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PLINK V 1.9 (Purcell et al, 2007) was used for further filtering for both datasets (derived from this study and the publicly available data). Individuals with a genotyping call rate < 99%, SNPs with a genotyping call rate < 99%, and those exhibiting significant deviations from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (P-value <10 -6 ) were excluded from the analysis (Taheri et al, 2023). Following this filtering process, the genetic data from both groups were combined, and only the SNPs that were common to both groups were selected.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A combination of lnθπ ratio and F ST value screened the selected genomic regions. VCFtools software [ 112 ] calculated the lnθπ ratio and F ST value using a sliding window, with a window size of 100 kb and a step size of 10 kb. Select the regions that meet both the top 5% and bottom 5% of the lnθπ ratio, as well as the top 5% of the F ST value, as the selected regions, and jointly screen for stronger selection signals to obtain the target gene.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%