1976
DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1976.tb07480.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of Separate Receptors for Adenosine and Adenosine 5′‐triphosphate in Causing Relaxations of the Isolated Taenia of the Guinea‐pig Caecum

Abstract: I The mechanisms by which adenosine 5'-triphosphate (ATP), adenosine 5'-diphosphate (ADP), adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP) and adenosine relax the taenia caecum preparation of the guineapig have been studied. ATP and ADP produced similar effects which were qualitatively different from those of AMP and adenosine. 2 2-2'Pyridylisatogen tosylate (PIT: 50 gM for 30 min) blocked the effects of ATP and ADP, but exhibited weak activity against AMP and failed to antagonize the effects of adenosine. The action of PIT … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After an early hint (Spedding and Weetman, 1976), receptors for purines were subdivided into P1 (adenosine) and P2 (ATP and ADP) receptors (Burnstock, 1978), and later subdivision of P2 receptors into P2X and P2Y subtypes was made on the basis of pharmacology (Burnstock and Kennedy, 1985). It was recognized that some P2Y receptors responded to pyrimidines as well as purines (Seifert and Schultz, 1989).…”
Section: Brief Historical Background Of Nucleotides and Their Recementioning
confidence: 99%
“…After an early hint (Spedding and Weetman, 1976), receptors for purines were subdivided into P1 (adenosine) and P2 (ATP and ADP) receptors (Burnstock, 1978), and later subdivision of P2 receptors into P2X and P2Y subtypes was made on the basis of pharmacology (Burnstock and Kennedy, 1985). It was recognized that some P2Y receptors responded to pyrimidines as well as purines (Seifert and Schultz, 1989).…”
Section: Brief Historical Background Of Nucleotides and Their Recementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, PIT does not antagonize the relaxant effects of adenosine (Spedding & Weetman, 1976), nor are the relaxant effects of non-adrenergic inhibitory nerves antagonized (Spedding, Sweetman & Weetman, 1975). From this latter evidence it is unlikely that the inhibitory neurotransmitter is ATP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…PIT had been used to differentiate P1 (adenosine) and P2 (nucleotide) receptors [8]. It was later demonstrated that PIT is an allosteric modulator of the chicken P2Y 1 receptor expressed in Xenopus oocytes [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%