2017
DOI: 10.5846/stxb201611022234
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of soil erosion risk patterns in a watershed based on source-sink landscape units

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different land use types exhibit different “source-sink” risk attributes in terms of soil erosion. In soil erosion risk research, landscape units based on land use are considered as the mosaic units, and the spatial distribution pattern of land use within the region can affect runoff and sediment loss (Wang et al, 2017). For defining “source” and “sink” landscape types, land use types with strong human interference, such as cultivated and construction land, are considered as “source” due to their extensive external input of materials and energy.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Different land use types exhibit different “source-sink” risk attributes in terms of soil erosion. In soil erosion risk research, landscape units based on land use are considered as the mosaic units, and the spatial distribution pattern of land use within the region can affect runoff and sediment loss (Wang et al, 2017). For defining “source” and “sink” landscape types, land use types with strong human interference, such as cultivated and construction land, are considered as “source” due to their extensive external input of materials and energy.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specific parameters have been described by Sun et al (2012). In this study, the weights for the source and sink landscapes were determined based on previous research (Wang et al, 2017). The weight values assigned to the different landscape types are 0.3, 0.4, 0.6 0.7, 0.5, 0.6, 0.8, and 0.8 for cultivated land, construction land, other land, low vegetation-covered grassland, low vegetation-covered forest, medium-high vegetation-covered grassland, medium-high vegetation-covered forest, and garden plot, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%