2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.02.04.21250683
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of Somatic Structural Variants in Solid Tumors By Optical Genome Mapping

Abstract: Genomic structural variants comprise a significant fraction of somatic mutations driving cancer onset and progression. However, such variants are not readily revealed by standard next generation sequencing. Optical genomic mapping (OGM) surpasses short read sequencing in detecting large (>500bp) and complex structural variants (SVs) but requires isolation of ultra-high molecular weight DNA from the tissue of interest. We have successfully applied a protocol involving a paramagnetic nanobind disc to a wide r… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter is now available within the most recent update of the Bionano software (Figure S10), as should be an ISCN-compatible nomenclature for OGM aberrations as suggested by us (Table S16) and others. 47 While we could show 100% sensitivity for detecting the previously known clinically relevant aberrations, we could also provide analytical validity on the basis of an in-depth technical comparison. As such, a comparison between OGM and FISH resulted in 100% sensitivity and specificity.…”
Section: Current Challenges and Opportunitiesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The latter is now available within the most recent update of the Bionano software (Figure S10), as should be an ISCN-compatible nomenclature for OGM aberrations as suggested by us (Table S16) and others. 47 While we could show 100% sensitivity for detecting the previously known clinically relevant aberrations, we could also provide analytical validity on the basis of an in-depth technical comparison. As such, a comparison between OGM and FISH resulted in 100% sensitivity and specificity.…”
Section: Current Challenges and Opportunitiesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The isodicentric Y chromosomes were called upon manual interrogation, while the isodicentric X chromosome showed a complex CNV profile with inverted maps (inverted duplications called by the software), from which the isodicentric chromosome X was inferred ( Figure 4 ). Notably, the isodicentric Y chromosome exhibits a characteristic mapping profile, which has been recently reported by Mantere et al, and can be visualized in the SV view of the software [ 20 ]. Consistent with the previous report, the three isodicentric Y chromosomes showed a genome map pattern where the maps were completely absent from the q arm starting from Yq11.222 compared to other XY samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, an independent coverage-based algorithm detects large CNVs and aneuploidies (similar to CMAs). Recently, several investigators have shown that OGM is 100% concordant when compared to standard-of-care (SOC) technologies in several settings including postnatal [ 18 ], hematological neoplasms [ 19 ], and solid tumors [ 20 ] in either a single site or multi-site studies. We have previously discussed the potential utility of OGM in prenatal diagnostic testing [ 21 ], but the application of the technology for a large-scale evaluation in a clinical setting for prenatal application remained elusive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supplementary Table 2 Intersection of predicted genes with mice disease-gene sets. GO_COVALENT_CHROMATIN_MO DIFICATION AC087623.3 [13] Supplementary References…”
Section: Availability Of Data Sources and Codementioning
confidence: 99%