1990
DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(90)90171-f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of sources of brain neuronal activity with high spatiotemporal resolution through combination of neuromagnetic source localization (NMSL) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
35
0
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
9
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results obtained with regard to the tonotopic organization of the N1m generator are basically consistent with numerous earlier studies [Pantev et al, 1988[Pantev et al, , 1989[Pantev et al, , 1990[Pantev et al, , 1995Yamamoto et al, 1988;Cansino et al, 1994]. However, the present study adds several details which disprove the naive assumption of a single tonotopically organized generator.…”
Section: Generator Structuresupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results obtained with regard to the tonotopic organization of the N1m generator are basically consistent with numerous earlier studies [Pantev et al, 1988[Pantev et al, , 1989[Pantev et al, , 1990[Pantev et al, , 1995Yamamoto et al, 1988;Cansino et al, 1994]. However, the present study adds several details which disprove the naive assumption of a single tonotopically organized generator.…”
Section: Generator Structuresupporting
confidence: 77%
“…1 Projections of the estimated dipole locations into magnetic resonance (MR) images showed that peak N1m originates from generators located in the depth of the sylvian fissure [Yamamoto et al, 1988;Pantev et al, 1990;Papanicolaou et al, 1990;Nakasato et al, 1995]. Evidence was given that the crucial stimulus parameter is the virtual pitch and not the frequency spectrum [Pantev et al, 1989].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This view receives support from the localization results for the SP reported by Scherg et al (1989) and Scherg and Picton (1991), and the localization of the SF reported by Hari (1980) and Hari et al (1980Hari et al ( , 1987. These authors found the sources of the SP and the SF to be located in the supratemporal cortex near the sources of the major component of the slow AEF (M100), having a latency of about 100 msec after the stimulus onset, which has been repeatedly shown to indicate the location of the auditory cortex and association areas (Yamamoto et al 1988;Pantev et al 1990;Papanicolaou et al 1990;Pantev 1992). On the other hand, the magnetic counterpart of the CNV, the contingent magnetic variation (CMV), cannot be accounted for by a single equivalent dipole (Elbert et al 1993).…”
Section: * Corresponding Authormentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A natural step in this direction would be the integration of anatomical information from magnetic resonance images (MRI). Previously, MRI data were only used to establish the plausibility of dipole locations within an anatomical context (e.g., Kuriki et al 1988;Reite et al 1988;Yamamoto et al 1988;Pantev et al 1990). The strategy for the future, however, must be to extract anatomical information from the MRI prior to the source analysis and to tailor both the source and the volume conductor model accordingly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%