1991
DOI: 10.1016/0304-4017(91)90087-c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of sylvatic Trichinella (T3) in foxes from France

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In some European countries (Spain, France, Czechoslovakia, Croatia, Serbia, Macedonia, Russia, Bulgaria), the epidemiology of trichinellosis is characterized by 2 different cycles due to Trichinella spiralis and Trichinella britovi, in other countries (Italy, Switzerland) only the second species appears to be present (La Rosa et al 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some European countries (Spain, France, Czechoslovakia, Croatia, Serbia, Macedonia, Russia, Bulgaria), the epidemiology of trichinellosis is characterized by 2 different cycles due to Trichinella spiralis and Trichinella britovi, in other countries (Italy, Switzerland) only the second species appears to be present (La Rosa et al 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…vulpes ) 4 France Provence Red fox ( V . vulpes ) Isoenzymatic analysis 2/1912 (0.1%) La Rosa et al (1991) France Country-wide Red fox ( V . vulpes ) RAPD-PCR 7/5457 (0.1%) Pozio et al (1996) Germany Not specified Red fox ( V .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…lupus ) 2/85 (2.4%) France Lozère & Haute Marne Red fox ( V . vulpes ) Isoenzymatic analysis 2/1912 (0.1%) La Rosa et al (1991) France Not specified Red fox ( V . vulpes ) Allozyme analysis 2 La Rosa et al (1992) France Southwest and Southeastern Finland Badger ( M .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extremely low (0.00001 to 0.1%) or even negligible prevalence rates have recently been reported e.g. from the UK (Smith et al, 2003), Denmark (Enemark et al, 2000), Germany (Schoffel et al, 1991;Ballek et al, 1992), and very low (0.1 to 5 %) in Sweden , Hungary (Sreter et al, 2003), Belgium (Verkammen et al, 2002), the Netherlands (van der Giessen et al, 1998), France (La Rosa et al, 1991), Spain (Perez-Martin et al, 2000) and Switzerland (Gottstein et al, 1997).…”
Section: Reservoir Surveillancementioning
confidence: 99%