2015
DOI: 10.1589/jpts.27.2217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of the affected lower limb and unaffected side motor functions as determinants of activities of daily living performance in stroke patients using partial correlation analysis

Abstract: [Purpose] This study aimed to clarify the independent impact of the affected upper and lower limb, trunk, and unaffected side motor functions on activities of daily living in stroke patients using partial correlation analysis. [Subjects and Methods] This retrospective study included 77 stroke patients. Motor functions were assessed using the Stroke Impairment Assessment Set, and the activities of daily living performance was assessed using the Barthel index or Functional Independence Measure. Further, simple a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the control group showed no significant difference in the pre-and post-tests (Table 3). The daily living activities in stroke patients are mainly affected by the motor ability of the upper limb, lower limb, and trunk (Fujita et al, 2015;Oliveira et al, 2006;Verheyden et al, 2006). Improved daily living activities were thought to have resulted in the improved motor function such as the upper limb, lower limb, and body balance among stroke patients in the HT group, thus further improving the daily living activities.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the control group showed no significant difference in the pre-and post-tests (Table 3). The daily living activities in stroke patients are mainly affected by the motor ability of the upper limb, lower limb, and trunk (Fujita et al, 2015;Oliveira et al, 2006;Verheyden et al, 2006). Improved daily living activities were thought to have resulted in the improved motor function such as the upper limb, lower limb, and body balance among stroke patients in the HT group, thus further improving the daily living activities.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, determining the relationship between motor function and ADLs is vital in designing rehabilitation programs aimed at improving ADLs. In people with stroke, the function of the affected upper limb (Mercier et al, 2001), affected lower limb (Fujita et al, 2015b), coordination of unaffected upper limb (Bjørneby & Reinvang, 1985), trunk function (Likhi, Jidesh, Kanagaraj, & George, 2013), and balance (Mercier et al, 2001) have been reported to be related to ADL independence.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Koike et al 18) reported that the Brunnstrom stage, as an indicator of the motor function of the affected lower limb, Sato, et al 36 had no significant differences between an independent toileting group and a non-independent toileting group of stroke patients. On the other hand, Fujita et al 25 ) reported that there was a strong relationship between the motor function of the affected lower limb and ADL independence, even when the effects of confounding factors, such as age and the motor function of the trunk and the limbs of the unaffected side, were excluded using partial correlation analysis. Our results revealed that the motor function of the affected lower limb was relevant to toileting performance when the stroke patients were divided into groups of independent-supervision or dependent toileting ability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that factors other than balance function are related to differences in toileting ability between supervision and dependent groups. Other studies have reported that trunk function 17,18) and aphasia 19 ) are relevant to toileting ability.Moreover, according to previous studies, there is a possibility that cognitive function 20,21) , unilateral spatial neglect 22,23) , and affected lower limb function 24,25) are related to toileting ability. These cognitive and physical functions may be associated with differences between supervision and dependent groups in toileting ability; however, it is unclear which function is most strongly related to toileting ability.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%