2017
DOI: 10.1557/mrc.2017.28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of the elastic–plastic constitutive model for measuring mechanical properties of metals by instrumented spherical indentation test

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most relevant of these for current purposes are those involving relatively large spherical indenters. [ 28,30,32–35 ] These include the work of Peng et al, [ 32,35 ] who showed that changes in experimental load–displacement plots induced by imposing “residual” stresses via externally applied loads were consistent with FEM predictions. Of course, load–displacement plots cannot be used to infer anisotropic residual stress states, as they provide no directional information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The most relevant of these for current purposes are those involving relatively large spherical indenters. [ 28,30,32–35 ] These include the work of Peng et al, [ 32,35 ] who showed that changes in experimental load–displacement plots induced by imposing “residual” stresses via externally applied loads were consistent with FEM predictions. Of course, load–displacement plots cannot be used to infer anisotropic residual stress states, as they provide no directional information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Furthermore, they assumed that the “residual” stress in the centre of their cruciform samples (where the indentation was conducted) was equal to the applied load over the sectional area of the “arm”: as shown below, this is an inaccurate assumption. Other relevant work includes that of Zhang et al, [ 30,34 ] who explored the effect of using different constitutive laws for plasticity and confirmed that the changes induced in the load–displacement plot by the presence of residual stresses can be significant. Finally, Wang et al [ 33 ] proposed a method for extracting both the plasticity parameters and the residual stress characteristics, using multiple indent depths.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(3) substituting the above-obtained parameters into Equations (14) and (16) to calculate the equibiaxial and shear stress part; (4) identifying the direction of the maximum principal residual stress from the direction of the major axis of residual indentation imprint and calculating the principal residual stresses according to the definition of the equibiaxial and shear stress parts. Generally, the sample's plastic properties could be identified using spherical indentation methods [36][37][38][39][40][41][42] or uniaxial tensile tests. The relative change in loading curvature could be obtained by fitting the load-depth curves of stressed and unstressed samples with Equation (2).…”
Section: Of 19mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the plastic parameters (i.e., yield strain, ε y , and strain-hardening exponent, n) of the tested materials are also involved in the established correlations, to calculate residual stresses, these plastic parameters must be known a priori. Fortunately, either uniaxial tensile/compressive tests or spherical indentation tests [36][37][38][39][40][41][42] could be utilized to determine the plastic parameters. Patel et al [39] established a protocol to obtain the uniaxial stress-strain curve directly from the spherical indentation stress-strain curve by introducing a scaling factor.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%