2003
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m212037200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of the F1-binding Surface on the δ-Subunit of ATP Synthase

Abstract: The stator function in ATP synthase was studied by a combined mutagenesis and fluorescence approach. Specifically, binding of ␦-subunit to ␦-depleted F 1 was studied. A plausible binding surface on ␦-subunit was identified from conservation of amino acid sequence and the high resolution NMR structure. Specific mutations aimed at modulating binding were introduced onto this surface. Affinity of binding of wild-type and mutant ␦-subunits to ␦-depleted F 1 was determined quantitatively using the fluorescence sign… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The b type subunit, which interacts primarily with ␦, is close to a so that it can be cross-linked (34); however, the additional binding energy due to this interaction is not required. Such an arrangement would be in line with previous results that suggest that the wild-type stator stalk is "overengineered" to ensure efficient coupling of proton translocation and catalysis (35). Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The b type subunit, which interacts primarily with ␦, is close to a so that it can be cross-linked (34); however, the additional binding energy due to this interaction is not required. Such an arrangement would be in line with previous results that suggest that the wild-type stator stalk is "overengineered" to ensure efficient coupling of proton translocation and catalysis (35). Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Initially (7) it was shown by proteolysis experiments using the Escherichia coli enzyme that δ subunit bound to the N-terminal region (residues 1-19) of the α subunit in the F 1 -complex. More recently, quantitative binding experiments showed that this interaction is extremely tight (8,9), and utilizes a binding surface formed between two parallel helices on the N-terminal domain of the δ subunit (10). A 22-residue peptide which mimicked residues 1-22 of α subunit was found to bind with high affinity to the same surface on δ subunit (11), forming a 1/1 complex.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In E. coli, subunit a interacts with the b subunits mostly through their single transmembrane segments and parts near the membrane [14,15], while the δ subunit (the ortholog of the mitochondrial OSCP or oligomycin sensitivity conferral protein) interacts with the amino termini of the α subunits at the "top" of the complex, which is the side away from the membrane ( Fig. 1; [16,17]; reviewed in [10,13]). The affinities between the F 1 and δ subunit, and a and b subunits appear to be sufficiently strong to withstand the considerable torque that has been measured in the single particle experiments [6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%