2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2006.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of the gravitational boundary in weathered gneiss by geophysical survey: La Clapière landslide (France)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
41
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the surface to the depth, the conducting superfi cial body corresponds well to the superfi cial secondary landslide as shown and discussed by Jomard et al (2007a). The main landslide body is characterized by the resistive part which could be associated with a highly deformed and destructured unsaturated mass.…”
Section: Ert Descriptions Ert1 (mentioning
confidence: 71%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…From the surface to the depth, the conducting superfi cial body corresponds well to the superfi cial secondary landslide as shown and discussed by Jomard et al (2007a). The main landslide body is characterized by the resistive part which could be associated with a highly deformed and destructured unsaturated mass.…”
Section: Ert Descriptions Ert1 (mentioning
confidence: 71%
“…This limitation can introduce an almost homogeneous under evaluation of the deepest measurements as proposed by Robain et al (1999). This problem is partly addressed by the very consistent correlation observed between resistivity ranges obtained for dipole-dipole and pole-pole arrays in our previous work (Jomard et al, 2007a).…”
Section: Electrical Resistivity Tomography (Ert)mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Geoelectric resistivity method is one of the geophysical methods that are widely used in the field of hydrogeology, disaster mitigation, and archeology [4][5][6][7]. Several previous studies have demonstrated that the geoelectric resistivity method was sufficient for determining the subsurface condition of landslide-prone areas [3], [8][9][10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%