2014
DOI: 10.1099/mic.0.071829-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of the immunoproteome of the meningococcus by cell surface immunoprecipitation and MS

Abstract: Most healthy adults are protected from meningococcal disease by the presence of naturally acquired anti-meningococcal antibodies; however, the identity of the target antigens of this protective immunity remains unclear, particularly for protection against serogroup B disease. To identify the protein targets of natural protective immunity we developed an immunoprecipitation and proteomics approach to define the immunoproteome of the meningococcus. Sera from 10 healthy individuals showing serum bactericidal acti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Combining proteomics with the detection of antigens that show immunoreactivity allows for the identification of immunogenic proteins/ peptides expressed during infection (Dennehy and McClean 2012). Most studies have been focused on either cell surface or outer membrane proteins (Montero et al 2014;Newcombe et al 2014;Wu et al 2008b;Zhou et al 2009), as these are the de facto interface for host-pathogen interactions. Additionally, secreted proteins could also be of special interest (Barh et al 2013;Campbell et al 2015;Enany et al 2012;Wang et al 2014b;Wu et al 2008a), as these are also primary antigen targets of the host immune response and include many virulence factors (Dennehy and McClean 2012).…”
Section: Immunoproteomics: a Doorway Into New Vaccines?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combining proteomics with the detection of antigens that show immunoreactivity allows for the identification of immunogenic proteins/ peptides expressed during infection (Dennehy and McClean 2012). Most studies have been focused on either cell surface or outer membrane proteins (Montero et al 2014;Newcombe et al 2014;Wu et al 2008b;Zhou et al 2009), as these are the de facto interface for host-pathogen interactions. Additionally, secreted proteins could also be of special interest (Barh et al 2013;Campbell et al 2015;Enany et al 2012;Wang et al 2014b;Wu et al 2008a), as these are also primary antigen targets of the host immune response and include many virulence factors (Dennehy and McClean 2012).…”
Section: Immunoproteomics: a Doorway Into New Vaccines?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This immunoproteomics approach used to identify potential candidate biomarkers has also been described for various viral or bacterial infections including Rickettsia parkeri , Neisseria meningitidis , Plasmodium knowlesi , and Klebsiella pneumoniae .…”
Section: Other “Omics” Approaches: a New Opportunity For Fundamental mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, some of these proteins were identified using 2D electrophoresis, immunoblotting, and MS in immune sera of contaminated guinea pigs, suggesting that animal models can be used to predict biomarkers in human. [148] This immunoproteomics approach used to identify potential candidate biomarkers has also been described for various viral or bacterial infections including Rickettsia parkeri, [149] Neisseria meningitidis, [150] Plasmodium knowlesi, [151] and Klebsiella pneumoniae.…”
Section: From Genomics To Proteomicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the studies correlating surface exposure of FHbp and susceptibility to killing by anti-FHbp antibodies was conducted by Newcombe and co-workers [27]. While strain L91543 displayed very little FHbp at the surface and demonstrated lack of killing by anti-FHbp sera, the well characterised MC58 strain demonstrated strong surface expression of FHbp and efficient killing by anti-FHbp sera [27]. We further observed a difference in size in FHbp between these 2 strains, despite their high amino acid (AA) sequence identity across the same length open reading frame (Fig 2a) [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%