2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2014.07.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of the mechanical properties of the carbon fiber and the interphase region based on computational micromechanics and Kriging metamodel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, carbon fiber represents obvious tension and compression asymmetry in axial direction. The mechanical properties of carbon fiber are shown in Table 2, in which the transverse elastic parameters are adopted through a recognition method by Lu et al., 30 and the compressive strength is taken from Oya and Johnson. 31 It is assumed that fiber fracture does not occur under transverse loadings, while fiber mainly undertakes fracture failure under axial loadings, which often manifests as brittle fracture.…”
Section: Finite-element Modeling and Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, carbon fiber represents obvious tension and compression asymmetry in axial direction. The mechanical properties of carbon fiber are shown in Table 2, in which the transverse elastic parameters are adopted through a recognition method by Lu et al., 30 and the compressive strength is taken from Oya and Johnson. 31 It is assumed that fiber fracture does not occur under transverse loadings, while fiber mainly undertakes fracture failure under axial loadings, which often manifests as brittle fracture.…”
Section: Finite-element Modeling and Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The properties of interface are shown in Table 3, of which elastic properties were acquired by parameter identification. 30 The parameters of B–K damage model were adopted as: Gn c = 25 J/m 2 , Gs c = 100 J/m 2 , η = 1.75. 33…”
Section: Finite-element Modeling and Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the interphase was modeled as a separate zone with the same constitutive and damage models of matrix, which makes the model more complicated. The parameter identification of the interphase of the carbon fiber-reinforced composite was conducted by the inverse strategy based on the experimental data, microstructural modeling method, and Kriging metamodel, including the identification of thickness, normal stiffness, and tangent stiffness [33]. This set of parameters was applied to predict the elastic and strength properties of carbon FRP composite yarn, and good agreement was found with other regular simulation model [34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Yang et al [25] developed a multi-scale finite element model of composites to evaluate the damage mechanism of materials under low velocity impact, which indicated that the matrix cracks initially occurred, and the delamination and fiber fracture were then initiated. Moreover, Zhu et al [26,27] proposed an inverse strategy (based on the Kriging metamodel) to simulate the three-phase finite element model of fiber-reinforced composites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%