30th Annual Conference of IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, 2004. IECON 2004
DOI: 10.1109/iecon.2004.1431740
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of the mechanical system of a drive in the frequency domain

Abstract: Abstruct -High performance drives require sophisticated control methods. For the tuning of such control schemes the mathematical model describing the plant must be known with some degree of confidence. Therefore, a reliable procedure for the identification of the drive system is aimed. Besides, it should be possible to implement it as part of an automatic tuning of the control. The present paper proposes some solutions for this task.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For comparison, the inertia, current loop time constant, and friction parameter values of the test bench are obtained through accurate measurement methods. First, measure the frequency response of the X -axis by the sweep frequency test, 24,31 and fit the measured curve with the following model, and then the accurate inertia value and the equivalent time constant value can be obtained…”
Section: Verification Of the Identification Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For comparison, the inertia, current loop time constant, and friction parameter values of the test bench are obtained through accurate measurement methods. First, measure the frequency response of the X -axis by the sweep frequency test, 24,31 and fit the measured curve with the following model, and then the accurate inertia value and the equivalent time constant value can be obtained…”
Section: Verification Of the Identification Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 3 shows the measured feed drive frequency response and the estimated frequency response curve based on the inertia model shown in equation (31). The amplitude-frequency curve between 10 and 200 Hz is used for fitting to avoid the influence of nonlinear friction and structural resonance modes.…”
Section: Test Benchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An additional advantage of the Luenberger-Observer is the effective filtering of quantisation noise for low resolution position encoders. cx (12) …”
Section: X/b Axismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the conservative approach presented here is robust against parameter variations in the range of 10 to 20 per cent, it is necessary to check the parameters after modifications like tool or workpiece changes. To ensure the robustness against inprocess parameter variations online parameter identification is required [12]. Modern control systems [13] measure the frequency response of the plant for commissioning purposes as shown in Figure 11 for the example in section 6.…”
Section: X/b Axismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the real mechanical system should be regarded as a complex multimass system, the simplified two-mass approximation has been successfully used in control design, for example, in the case of rolling-mill drives, conveyor drives, and other production processes [7]. As the two-mass-system-based modeling has become popular, numerous advanced control methods have been proposed, for example, in [8]- [12], in order to obtain high dynamics of the drive system.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%