2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.12.106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of the microbes mediating Fe reduction in a deep saline aquifer and their influence during managed aquifer recharge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are several possible reasons for the low amount of iron‐ and manganese‐reducing bacteria in high‐Fe groundwater. First, iron‐ and manganese‐reducing bacteria cannot survive in groundwater with high ion levels (Ko, Cho, Jeong, & Lee, ). Second, the high Fe 2+ concentration as a resultant, or the limited availability of Fe(III) as an electron acceptor, inhibits the reproduction of iron‐ and manganese‐reducing bacteria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are several possible reasons for the low amount of iron‐ and manganese‐reducing bacteria in high‐Fe groundwater. First, iron‐ and manganese‐reducing bacteria cannot survive in groundwater with high ion levels (Ko, Cho, Jeong, & Lee, ). Second, the high Fe 2+ concentration as a resultant, or the limited availability of Fe(III) as an electron acceptor, inhibits the reproduction of iron‐ and manganese‐reducing bacteria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several possible reasons for the low amount of iron-and manganese-reducing bacteria in high-Fe groundwater. First, iron-and manganese-reducing bacteria cannot survive in groundwater with high ion levels (Ko, Cho, Jeong, & Lee, 2016). Second, the high Fe 2+…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…S1(a)). The study site has a geological profile of top soil (0-0.8 m), sand layer (0.8-9.6 m), and silty clay layer (9.6-25.8 m), with the groundwater level located at 1.5 m below the ground surface (Ko et al, 2016;Lee et al, 2020). The extraction well is installed 15.2 m away from the riverside and is screened from 8.0 to 9.0 m below the ground surface (Fig.…”
Section: Study Site and Sample Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the activity of indigenous microbes are relied upon in MAR systems to ameliorate the quality of recharging source waters, for example, by removing viral pathogens [77], mediating redox reactions affecting metal(loid) mobility [122,123], and affecting the fate of TOrCs [97,124], there is growing interest in quantifying the composition, diversity and change of microbial communities. At two pilot MAR sites in Perth and Adelaide, Reed et al [125] evaluated changes in the sulphate reducing bacterial populations in relation to nutrient inputs in the source water by characterising sulphate-reducing enrichment cultures using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis of polymerase chain reaction amplified 16S rRNA genes.…”
Section: Changes To Subsurface Microbial Ecologymentioning
confidence: 99%