Municipal solid waste (MSW) includes packaging waste, yard waste, wood, textile, newsprints, bottles, food waste, metals, and plastics. Trade, industry, and human population growth plus variations in living standards and in consumption patterns have been the main factors for progressive increase in generating MSW. As a consequence, management of MSW is one of the major challenges for municipalities in the 21st century [1][2]. In developing Asian countries, these factors are Pol. J. Environ. Stud. Vol. 26, No. 3 (2017)
AbstractThis paper evaluates the environmental impacts of various municipal solid waste (MSW) treatment options produced on-site simultaneously with energy and material recovery. The results present a comparison of life cycle assessment (LCA) for municipal solid waste management (MSWM) in five different waste scenarios along with baseline scenario of the Defence Housing Authority (DHA) in Lahore. All scenarios were modeled using EaseTech software. Nine impact categories were assessed and results were presented based on the ASTM D5231-92(2003) characterization method. Results revealed that a material recovery facility (MRF) had low global warming potential (GWP), but lower avoided burdens in other impact categories. The incineration process indicated fewer burdens on the environment such as GWP (-2.086×10 7 kg CO 2 eq) as compared to landfills (2.461×10 7 kg CO 2 eq). This was due to lower avoided emissions in the landfill process compared to incineration. The negative values in results represented higher avoided emissions in treatment processes. Bio-gasification avoided CO 2 emissions (-8.053×10 5 kg CO 2 eq), but showed negative impacts in other categories. Almost all impact categories were high in composting except for freshwater eutrophication. LCA results provided good knowledge for decision makers as a tool to decide what alternative is a better change for sustainable waste management.