1987
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(87)80062-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of the optimal electrocardiographic leads for detecting acute epicardial injury in acute myocardial infarction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
1
1

Year Published

1988
1988
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
20
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For identification of ST changes in established AMI, leads III and V 2 have been suggested to be optimal. 24 However, these results are not immediately applicable to ED patients with suspected ACS. First, many ED patients with ACS do not have ST-segment changes at all but, rather, T-wave inversions, new Q waves, or no ECG changes at all, and the ECG changes may, in turn, be due to subtotal and varying occlusion of branches of the large coronary arteries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…For identification of ST changes in established AMI, leads III and V 2 have been suggested to be optimal. 24 However, these results are not immediately applicable to ED patients with suspected ACS. First, many ED patients with ACS do not have ST-segment changes at all but, rather, T-wave inversions, new Q waves, or no ECG changes at all, and the ECG changes may, in turn, be due to subtotal and varying occlusion of branches of the large coronary arteries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The frequency response was set at the range of 0.05-150Hz and the sampling rate was 500 Hz. The admission ECG was used to designate the location of the acute ischemia based on ST deviation patterns according to the method described by Aldrich et al (22). To estimate MI size from the ECG, the 50-criteria/31-point Selvester QRS scoring system was employed.…”
Section: Electrocardiographic Recordings and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, although V 1 is an excellent lead for diagnosing arrhythmias with a wide QRS complex (bundle-branch blocks, ventricular pacemaker rhythms, and wide QRS tachycardias), it is insensitive for detecting acute myocardial ischemia. 83,116,117 …”
Section: Common 5-electrode Limb Leads Plus 1 Precordial Lead Combinamentioning
confidence: 99%