2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2010.08.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of the optimal (α+β) forging process parameters of Ti–6.5Al–3.5Mo–1.5Zr–0.3Si based on processing-maps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the deformation temperature reached 900 °C, sufficient recrystallization took place, which contributed to the refinement of initial The deformation activation energy of as-rolled Ti-55 alloy in α + β dual-phase region and β single-phase region was calculated to be 453.00 KJ/mol and 279.88 KJ/mol, respectively, both of which were greater than the lattice self-diffusion energy of α-Ti (150 KJ/mol) and β-Ti (153 KJ/mol) [4,9]. The results indicated that the main softening mechanism should be dynamic recrystallization in α + β dual-phase region and dynamic recovery in β single-phase region, respectively [20,21]. It should be noted that the activation energy in β phase region was mostly reported in the range of 180-220 kJ/mol during hot deformation of some titanium alloys [10,[21][22][23], while the activation energy in β region of the Ti-55 alloy reached 279.88 kJ, which was higher than other titanium alloys.…”
Section: mentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As the deformation temperature reached 900 °C, sufficient recrystallization took place, which contributed to the refinement of initial The deformation activation energy of as-rolled Ti-55 alloy in α + β dual-phase region and β single-phase region was calculated to be 453.00 KJ/mol and 279.88 KJ/mol, respectively, both of which were greater than the lattice self-diffusion energy of α-Ti (150 KJ/mol) and β-Ti (153 KJ/mol) [4,9]. The results indicated that the main softening mechanism should be dynamic recrystallization in α + β dual-phase region and dynamic recovery in β single-phase region, respectively [20,21]. It should be noted that the activation energy in β phase region was mostly reported in the range of 180-220 kJ/mol during hot deformation of some titanium alloys [10,[21][22][23], while the activation energy in β region of the Ti-55 alloy reached 279.88 kJ, which was higher than other titanium alloys.…”
Section: mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The results indicated that the main softening mechanism should be dynamic recrystallization in α + β dual-phase region and dynamic recovery in β single-phase region, respectively [20,21]. It should be noted that the activation energy in β phase region was mostly reported in the range of 180-220 kJ/mol during hot deformation of some titanium alloys [10,[21][22][23], while the activation energy in β region of the Ti-55 alloy reached 279.88 kJ, which was higher than other titanium alloys.…”
Section: mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…According to the dynamic materials model (DMM) [5,9], the system input energy P can be divided into two portions: a dissipative quantity (G) and a dissipative association term (J).…”
Section: Processing Mapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is generally expected that the optimal deformation condition is met when the efficiency is the maximum. However, some materials may exhibit unstable flow characteristics during the deformation process, such as flow localization, adiabatic shear, void generation, and cracks [9,21]. Prasad [5,6] has derived the following instability criterion to identify whether or not the instabilities occur in the hot deformation process:…”
Section: Processing Mapmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation