2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-04364-7_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of the Palaeocene–Eocene Boundary Based on Larger Foraminifers in Deposits of the Palaeogene Adriatic Carbonate Platform, Southwestern Slovenia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Biostratigraphic data from sections in the SE Pyrenees, Egypt and Slovenia demonstrate that the PETM occurred at the base of the SBZ-5 biozone (e.g., Orue-Etxebarria et al, 2001;Pujalte et al, 2003aPujalte et al, , 2009Scheibner et al, 2005;Zamagni, 2012;Drobne, 2014). In the Campo section, in particular, the thermal event is recorded within terrestrial deposits from the lower part of DS Il-1 ( Fig.…”
Section: Age Modelsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Biostratigraphic data from sections in the SE Pyrenees, Egypt and Slovenia demonstrate that the PETM occurred at the base of the SBZ-5 biozone (e.g., Orue-Etxebarria et al, 2001;Pujalte et al, 2003aPujalte et al, , 2009Scheibner et al, 2005;Zamagni, 2012;Drobne, 2014). In the Campo section, in particular, the thermal event is recorded within terrestrial deposits from the lower part of DS Il-1 ( Fig.…”
Section: Age Modelsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Oriented equatorial sections of megalospheric and partly microspherical specimens (A and B forms, respectively) were prepared because the most important taxonomic and evolutionary parameters are observed in this part of the test (Less, 1987;Ferràndez-Cañadell, 1998). Biometric measurements and counts were Drobne et al (2014) and Papazzoni et al (2017) with respect to the Paleocene-Eocene boundary. The orthophragminid zones (OZ) are from Less et al (2007) and their boundaries with respect to SBZ zones are after Papazzoni et al (2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the eighteen years since the appearance of the SB zonation, a wealth of data on the morphology, biostratigraphy, and paleogeography of Paleogene LBF became available, leading to significant updates ( Fig. 1): (1) Increasing the precision in determining boundaries and achieving further subdivision of the previous standard zones as results of biometric studies on different nummulitid genera such as Heterostegina and Spiroclypeus (Less and Ozcan 2008) or through a multidisciplinary study of a section (Less et al 2011;Zakrevskaya et al 2011;Ozcan et al 2009Ozcan et al , 2014Ozcan et al , 2015; (2) Increasing knowledge of the characteristic foraminiferal assemblages in standard biozones, due to new studies on composition, ecology, and age attribution of regional faunas spanning from the Pyrenean Basin, to the Adriatic-Apulian area, Greece, Eastern Africa, Turkey, Oman, Pakistan, and Tibet (Benedetti et al 2010(Benedetti et al , 2011Pearson 2011, 2012;Zhang et al 2013;Accordi et al 2014;Cotton et al 2014Cotton et al , 2015Drobne et al 2014;Kahsnitz et al 2016); (3) New attempts at correlating the SB zones with isotope and magnetic stratigraphy and with the standard plankton zones (Rodriguez-Pintó 2012Gebhardt et al 2013;Egger et al 2013;Molina et al 2016); (4) New studies of foraminiferal assemblages from the Peritethys (Crimea, Northern Caucasus to Mangyschlak, Northern Peri-Aralian areas) and from the Caribbean region (Zakrevskaya 2011;Molina et al 2016); and (5) New detailed studies of the systematics and inner structures of particular LBF groups, such as rotaliids, larger miliolids, and ophtalmidids (Hottinger 2009(Hottinger , 2014Benedetti and Briguglio 2012;Benedetti 2015;Briguglio et al 2011Briguglio et al , 2013Briguglio et al , 2016.…”
Section: Updating the Sb Zonesmentioning
confidence: 99%