2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2012.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of the pathogenic pathways in osteoarthritic hip cartilage: commonality and discord between hip and knee OA

Abstract: This study is the first to report a comprehensive gene expression analysis of human hip OA cartilage compared to control (NOF) cartilage at the whole-genome level. Our differential gene expression dataset shows excellent correlation with similar defined studies using comparable tissue but reveals discord between hip and knee OA at the individual gene status but with commonality with regards the molecular pathways involved.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

9
86
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
9
86
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For both genes, the AEI observed in cartilage was small in magnitude but highly significant and was also observed in other joint tissues. As noted in the results, interrogation of our previously published microarray data of cartilage [15] revealed that GNL3 and SPCS1 were in the highest quartile of expressed genes. However, in this data set neither gene demonstrated a diffence in expression between OA cartilage and cartilage from non-OA controls.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For both genes, the AEI observed in cartilage was small in magnitude but highly significant and was also observed in other joint tissues. As noted in the results, interrogation of our previously published microarray data of cartilage [15] revealed that GNL3 and SPCS1 were in the highest quartile of expressed genes. However, in this data set neither gene demonstrated a diffence in expression between OA cartilage and cartilage from non-OA controls.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Interrogation of our previously published microarray analysis of cartilage [15] revealed that GNL3 and SPCS1 were in the highest quartile of expressed genes, GLT8D1 , PBRM1 , NT5DC2 and POC1A fell between the upper and lower quartiles, and TMEM110 was within the lowest quartile.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Furthermore, the model can be helpful to further investigate the differences in the OA pathomechansim of chondrocytes from different joints (knee, hip, ankle) as shown by Xu et al in a study comparing hip and knee OA cartilage. 67 Concluding, the porcine chondrocyte micromass model displayed significant parallels to human cartilage and vice versa confirmed the applicability of known human cartilage markers and characteristics in the porcine micromass model. TNF-α treatment initiated a typical OA reaction pattern suggesting the porcine micromass model as suitable tissue platform for the evaluation of innovative substances and techniques for the treatment of OA.…”
Section: ■ Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…We had previously generated gene expression microarray data for hip cartilage from patients who had undergone joint replacement surgery due to either hip OA or a neck of femur (NOF) fracture (Xu et al 2012). This latter cartilage serves as a non-OA control.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge, this is the first study to compare methylation patterns between cartilage from different joints and the differences we observed at the GDF5 locus may reflect global differences in DNA methylation patterns between cartilages from different joints. Such differential methylation by skeletal site could partly explain why there is a limited overlap between the genes aberrantly expressed in OA hip and OA knee cartilage (Xu et al 2012). The methylation differences between OA and control cartilage in the CpG island and between OA knee and hip cartilage in the 5ʹUTR are only small (3–12 %) but are similar to those observed at the MMP13 and SOX9 promoters in OA and control hip cartilage (Bui et al 2012; Kim et al 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%