2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-81-322-2517-1_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of the Plants Based on Leaf Shape Descriptors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The accuracy of the HOG and Hu invariant moments descriptor achieved in this study were 84.70% and 25.31% respectively. In the study presented by Salve et al (2016) , the implementation of the HOG and Zernike moments descriptor were proposed. This study used the subset Visleaf dataset which contained 50 plant species and 10 samples for each of species, which is a total of 500 images.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy of the HOG and Hu invariant moments descriptor achieved in this study were 84.70% and 25.31% respectively. In the study presented by Salve et al (2016) , the implementation of the HOG and Zernike moments descriptor were proposed. This study used the subset Visleaf dataset which contained 50 plant species and 10 samples for each of species, which is a total of 500 images.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig.15. Accuracies using approach [5] (blue) and current approach (red) In [14] the Zernike moment and HoG method is used as shape descriptor for the classification of leaves. HoG depends largely on the block size, cell size and number of orientation bins, which tend to be different for different shapes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall accuracy is 27.4%. Fig.16 compares accuracies of approach [14] (blue) with current approach (red). Fig.16.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations