2001
DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.2001.4612
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of thermodynamically relevant interactions between EF-Tu and backbone elements of tRNA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
46
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
46
1
Order By: Relevance
“…First, the tightest binding tRNAs tend to have AU and GU base pairs at positions 49-65 and 7-66 at the junction of the acceptor and T stems. Second, the weaker binding tRNAs tend to have a mismatch or AU pair at 1-72 and a GU pair at 50-64, which may prevent the formation of thermodynamically important 2Ј hydroxyl contacts that form at positions 1 and 64 (16). Interestingly, all of these sites have previously been proposed to be ''antideterminants'' that reduce EF-Tu binding to tRNA fMet or tRNA Sec .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…First, the tightest binding tRNAs tend to have AU and GU base pairs at positions 49-65 and 7-66 at the junction of the acceptor and T stems. Second, the weaker binding tRNAs tend to have a mismatch or AU pair at 1-72 and a GU pair at 50-64, which may prevent the formation of thermodynamically important 2Ј hydroxyl contacts that form at positions 1 and 64 (16). Interestingly, all of these sites have previously been proposed to be ''antideterminants'' that reduce EF-Tu binding to tRNA fMet or tRNA Sec .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, because the tRNA Phe and tRNA Cys complexes were crystallized in different space groups, it is also possible that the observed differences in the protein-RNA contacts are the result of different packing constraints in the crystal lattice and do not reflect the interaction in solution (19,20). Indeed, several of the 2Ј hydroxyl contacts in the tRNA Phe structure, which differ from those in the tRNA Cys structure, do not contribute to the overall binding energy (16). Thus, not all of the observed differences in the two x-ray structures may be relevant to the specificity in solution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Titration curves were plotted from data averaged from three experiments and fit to the following equation (21) by using the graphing program KALEIDAGRAPH (Abelbeck Software, Reading, PA) to estimate Interaction of the C-terminal tails of S9 and S13 with tRNA (red) in the Thermus thermophilus 30S subunit P site (5,6). Large (S9⌬26, S13⌬36) and small (S9⌬3, S13⌬5) tail deletions are red and yellow, respectively; a C-terminal extension of S13 present in T. thermophilus but not in E. coli is gray.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%