2015
DOI: 10.1080/09540105.2015.1086978
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of tuna species (Thunnini tribe) by PCR-RFLP analysis of mitochondrial DNA fragments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Damasceno et al (2016) found high bootstrap values for Epinephelidae species tested using the COI marker, indicating that the COI gene is reliable for identifying these species. High bootstrap values were also reported by Xu et al (2016), where several tuna species were examined. As the 650-bp region for the COI barcode may be degraded in highly processed samples, methods such as multiplex PCR and mini-barcoding, which target a shorter fragment of this gene region, are effective in species authentication.…”
Section: Cytochrome C Oxidase I (Coi)mentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Damasceno et al (2016) found high bootstrap values for Epinephelidae species tested using the COI marker, indicating that the COI gene is reliable for identifying these species. High bootstrap values were also reported by Xu et al (2016), where several tuna species were examined. As the 650-bp region for the COI barcode may be degraded in highly processed samples, methods such as multiplex PCR and mini-barcoding, which target a shorter fragment of this gene region, are effective in species authentication.…”
Section: Cytochrome C Oxidase I (Coi)mentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Being a crucial economic asset among marine fishery resources, tuna (Thunnini) stands out as the most prized and commercially valuable fish globally [1][2][3]. Likewise, the Western and Central Pacific Ocean (WCPO) boasts the world's largest tuna industry, with yearly catches surpassing 2 million metric tons (mt), constituting roughly half of the global tuna harvest [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, mitochondria remain after processing, which avoids DNA loss, and since mitochondrial DNA is more abundant than nuclear DNA, it is easier to detect [20,21]. Real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) [4,5,[22][23][24], multiple PCR [19,21,25,26], loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) [6], PCR restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) [7,27], and others have been reported as viable DNA-based PCR techniques for tuna species identification. Real-time PCR assays require an expensive machine and have the disadvantage that it must be done by skilled experimenters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%