Identified particle production, azimuthal anisotropy, and interferometry measurements in<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Au</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Au</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math>collisions at<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">NN</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><

Abelev, B. I.; Aggarwal, M. M.; Ahammed, Z.; Alakhverdyants, A. V.; Anderson, B. D.; Arkhipkin, D.; Averichev, G. S.; Balewski, J.; Barannikova, O.; Barnby, L. S.; Baumgart, Stephen; Beavis, D.; Bellwied, R.; Benedosso, F.; Betancourt, M.; Betts, R. R.; Bhasin, A.; Bhati, A. K.; Bichsel, H.; Bielčík, J.; Bielčíková, J.; Biritz, B.; Bland, L. C.; Bnzarov, I.; Bonner, B. E.; Bouchet, J.; Braidot, E.; Brandin, A. V.; Bridgeman, A.; Bruna, E.; Bueltmann, S.; Burton, T. P.; Cai, X. Z.; Caines, H.; Sánchez, M. Calderón De La Barca; Catu, O.; Cebra, D.; Cendejas, R.; Cervantes, M. C.; Chajęcki, Z.; Chaloupka, P.; Chattopadhyay, S.; Chen, H. F.; Chen, J. H.; Chen, J. Y.; Cheng, J.; Cherney, M.; Chikanian, A.; Choi, K. E.; Christie, W.; Chung, P.; Clarke, R. F.; Codrington, M. J. M.; Corliss, R.; Cramer, J. G.; Crawford, H. J.; Das, Dipayan; Dash, S.; Silva, L. C. De; Debbe, R.; Dedovich, T. G.; Dephillips, M.; Derevschikov, A. A.; Souza, R. Derradi de; Didenko, L.; Djawotho, P.; Dogra, S.; Dong, X.; Drachenberg, J. L.; Draper, J. E.; Dunlop, J. C.; Mazumdar, M. R. Dutta; Efimov, L. G.; Elhalhuli, E.; Elnimr, M.; Engelage, J.; Eppley, G.; Erazmus, B.; Estienne, M.; Eun, L.; Fachini, P.; Fatemi, R.; Fedorišin, J.; Fersch, R. G.; Filip, P.; Finch, E.; Fine, V.; Fisyak, Y.; Gagliardi, C. A.; Gangadharan, D. R.; Ganti, M. S.; García-Solis, E.; Geromitsos, A.; Geurts, F. J. M.; Ghazikhanian, V.; Ghosh, P.; Gorbunov, Y. N.; Gordon, A.; Grebenyuk, O. G.; Grosnick, D.; Grube, B.; Guertin, S. M.; Gupta, A.; Gupta, N.; Guryn, W.; Haag, B.; Hallman, T. J.; Hamed, A.; Han, L.; Harris, J. W.; Hays-Wehle, J. P.; Heinz, M.; Heppelmann, S.; Hirsch, A.; Hjort, E.; Hoffman, A. M.; Hoffmann, G. W.; Hofman, D. J.; Hollis, R. S.; Huang, H. Z.; Humanic, T. J.; Huo, L.; Igo, G.; Iordanova, A.; Jacobs, P.; Jacobs, W. W.; Jakl, P.; Jena, C.; Jin, F.; Jones, C. L.; Jones, P.; Joseph, J.; Judd, E. G.; Kabana, S.; Kajimoto, K.; Kang, K.; Kapitan, J.; Kauder, K.; Keane, D.; Kechechyan, A.; Kettler, David; Khodyrev, V. Yu; Kikoła, D. P.; Kiryluk, J.; Kisiel, A.; Klein, S. R.; Knospe, A. G.; Kocoloski, A.; Koetke, D. D.; Kollegger, T.; Konzer, J.; Kopytine, M.; Koralt, I.; Korsch, W.; Kotchenda, L.; Kouchpil, V.; Кравцов, П.; Kravtsov, V. I.; Krueger, K.; Krůs, M.; Kumar, L.; Kurnadi, P.; Lamont, M. A.C.; Landgraf, J. M.; LaPointe, S.; Lauret, J.; Lebedev, A.; Lednický, R.; Lee, CH; Lee, J. H.; Leight, W. A.; LeVine, M. J.; Li, C.; Li, N.; Li, Y.; Li, Z.; Lin, G.; Lin, X.; Lindenbaum, S. J.; Lisa, M. A.; Liu, F.; Liu, H.; Liu, J.; Ljubičić, T.; Llope, W. J.; Longacre, R. S.; Love, W. A.; Lu, Y.; Ludlam, T.; L., G.; G., Y.; Mahapatra, D. P.; Majka, R.; Mall, O.; Mangotra, L. K.; Manweiler, R.; Margetis, S.; Markert, C.; Masui, H.; Matis, H. S.; Matulenko, Yu. A.; McDonald, D.; McShane, T. S.; Meschanin, A.; Milner, R.; Minaev, N. G.; Mioduszewski, S.; Mischke, A.; Mitrovski, M.; Mohanty, B.; Морозов, Д. А.; Munhoz, M. G.; Nandi, B. K.; Nattrass, C.; Nayak, T. K.; Nelson, J. M.; Netrakanti, P. K.; Ng, M. J.; Nogach, L. V.; Nurushev, S. B.; Odyniec, G.; Ogawa, A.; Okada, H.; Okorokov, V.; Olson, D.; Pachr, M.; Page, B. S.; Pal, Subrata; Pandit, Y.; Panebratsev, Y.; Pawlak, T.; Peitzmann, T.; Perevoztchikov, V.; Perkins, C.; Peryt, W.; Phatak, S. C.; Pile, P.; Planinić, M.; Płoskoń, M.; Pluta, J.; Plyku, D.; Poljak, N.; Poskanzer, A. M.; Potukuchi, B.; Prindle, D.; Pruneau, C.; Pruthi, N. K.; Pujahari, P. R.; Putschke, J.; Raniwala, R.; Raniwala, S.; Ray, R. L.; Redwine, R.; Reed, R.; Rehberg, J. M.; Ridiger, A.; Ritter, H. G.; Roberts, J.B.; Rogachevskiy, O. V.; Romero, J. L.; Rose, A.; Roy, C.; Ruan, L.; Russcher, M. J.; Sahoo, R.; Sakai, S.; Sakrejda, I.; Sakuma, T.; Salur, S.; Sandweiss, J.; Schambach, J.; Scharenberg, R. P.; Schmitz, N.; Schuster, T.; Seele, J.; Seger, J.; Selyuzhenkov, I.; Seyboth, P.; Shahaliev, E.; Shao, M.; Sharma, M.; Shi, S. S.; Sichtermann, E. P.; Simon, F.; Singaraju, R.; Skoby, M. J.; Smirnov, N.; Sorensen, P.; Sowiński, J.; Spinka, H. M.; Srivastava, B.; Stanislaus, T. D. S.; Staszak, D.; Stephans, G. S. F.; Stock, R.; Strikhanov, M.; Stringfellow, B.; Suaide, A. A. P.; Suarez, M. C.; Subba, Nirpat; Šumbera, M.; Sun, X. M.; Sun, Y.; Sun, Z.; Surrow, B.; Symons, T. J. M.; Toledo, A. Szanto de; Takahashi, J.; Tang, A. H.; Tang, Z.; Tarini, L. H.; Tarnowsky, T.; Thein, D.; Thomas, J. H.; Tian, J.; Timmins, A. R.; Timoshenko, S.; Tlusty, D.; Tokarev, M.; Trainor, T. A.; Tram, V. N.; Trentalange, S.; Tribble, R. E.; Tsai, O. D.; Ulery, J.; Ullrich, T.; Underwood, D. G.; Buren, G. Van; Nieuwenhuizen, G. van; Vanfossen, J. A.; Varma, R.; Vasconcelos, G. M.S.; Vasiliev, A.; Videbæk, F.; Viyogi, Y. P.; Vokál, S.; Voloshin, S. A.; Wada, M.; Walker, M.; Wang, F.; Wang, G.; Wang, H.; Wang, J. S.; Wang, Q.; Wang, X.; Wang, X. L.; Wang, Y.; Webb, G.; Webb, J. C.; Westfall, G. D.; Whitten, C.; Wieman, H.; Wissink, S. W.; Witt, R.; Wu, Y.; Xie, W.; Xu, N.; Xu, Q. H.; Xu, W.; Xu, Y.; Xu, Z.; Xue, L.; Yang, Y.; Yepes, P.; Yip, K.; Yoo, I. K.; Yue, Q.; Zawisza, M.; Zbroszczyk, H.; Zhan, W.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, W. M.; Zhang, X. P.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Z. P.; Zhao, Ye-Yin; Chen, Zhong; Zhou, Jing; Zhou, Wei; Zhu, X.; Zhu, Y.; Zoulkarneev, R.; Zoulkarneeva, Y.

doi:10.1103/physrevc.81.024911

Cited by 230 publications

(88 citation statements)

References 137 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For (dE T /dη)/(0.5N part ), data are shown from FOPI 0-1% centrality Au+Au collisions [27], E802 0%-5% centrality Au+Au collisions [28], NA49 0-7% centrality Pb+Pb collisions [29,30], STAR 0%-5% centrality Au+Au collisions [18], and CMS 0%-5% centrality Pb+Pb collisions [30]. For (dN ch /dη)/(0.5N part ), data are shown from FOPI [27], E802 [28,31,32], NA49 [29], STAR [18,33], PHO-BOS 0-3% centrality Au+Au collisions [17], ALICE 0%-5% centrality Pb+Pb collisions [34], and ATLAS [35] Pb+Pb collisions interpolated to 0%-5% centrality. The data are plotted on a log-log scale to illustrate the power law behavior of both (dE T /dη)/(0.5N part ) and (dN ch /dη)/(0.5N part ) as a function of log( ply as E T /N ch , is a variable that is related to the average transverse mass of the produced particles [3].…”

Section: Au+au Beam Energy Scan Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Transverse energy production and charged-particle multiplicity at midrapidity in various systems fromsNN=7.7to 200 GeV

Adare¹,

Afanasiev²,

Aidala³

et al. 2016

Phys. Rev. C

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Measurements of midrapidity charged particle multiplicity distributions, dN ch /dη, and midrapidity transverse-energy distributions, dET /dη, are presented for a variety of collision systems and energies. Included are distributions for Au+Au collisions at For all A+A collisions down to √ s N N = 7.7 GeV, it is observed that the midrapidity data are better described by scaling withNqp than scaling with Npart. Also presented are estimates of the Bjorken energy density, εBJ, and the ratio of dET /dη to dN ch /dη, the latter of which is seen to be constant as a function of centrality for all systems.

show abstract

Section: Au+au Beam Energy Scan Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Transverse energy production and charged-particle multiplicity at midrapidity in various systems fromsNN=7.7to 200 GeV

Adare¹,

Afanasiev²,

Aidala³

et al. 2016

Phys. Rev. C

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The detailed procedures to obtain the simulated multiplicity are similar to that described in Ref. [43]. A two-component model [44] is used to calculate the simulated multiplicity distribution given by…”

Section: Centrality Determinationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Inclusive charged hadron elliptic flow in Au+Au collisions atsNN=7.7–39 GeV

Adamczyk¹,

Agakishiev²,

Aggarwal³

et al. 2012

Phys. Rev. C

Self Cite

150

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…From the experimental point of view the existence/ location of the CEP is the major goal of several programs, namely the Beam Energy Scan (BES-I) program at RHIC which has been ongoing since 2010 looking for the experimental signatures of a first-order phase transition and the CEP by colliding Au ions at several energies [7]. Recently, the results of the moments of net-charge multiplicity distributions were presented by STAR Collaboration [8].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influence of the inverse magnetic catalysis and the vector interaction in the location of the critical end point

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The effect of a strong magnetic field on the location of the critical end point (CEP) in the QCD phase diagram is discussed under different scenarios. In particular, we consider the contribution of the vector interaction and take into account the inverse magnetic catalysis obtained in lattice QCD calculations at zero chemical potential. The discussion is realized within the (2 þ 1) Polyakov-Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model. It is shown that the vector interaction and the magnetic field have opposite competing effects, and that the winning effect depends strongly on the intensity of the magnetic field. The inverse magnetic catalysis at zero chemical potential has two distinct effects for magnetic fields above ≳0.3 GeV 2 : it shifts the CEP to lower chemical potentials, hinders the increase of the CEP temperature and prevents a too large increase of the baryonic density at the CEP. For fields eB < 0.1 GeV 2 the competing effects between the vector contribution and the magnetic field can move the CEP to regions of temperature and density in the phase diagram that could be more easily accessible to experiments.

show abstract

Identified particle production, azimuthal anisotropy, and interferometry measurements inAu+Aucollisions atsNN<

Cited by 230 publications

References 137 publications

Transverse energy production and charged-particle multiplicity at midrapidity in various systems fromsNN=7.7to 200 GeV

Transverse energy production and charged-particle multiplicity at midrapidity in various systems fromsNN=7.7to 200 GeV

Inclusive charged hadron elliptic flow in Au+Au collisions atsNN=7.7–39 GeV

Influence of the inverse magnetic catalysis and the vector interaction in the location of the critical end point

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About