2020
DOI: 10.1136/injuryprev-2019-043432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying a gap in drowning prevention: high-risk populations

Abstract: IntroductionSome populations have been less susceptible to reductions in drowning than others. It has been hypothesised that this is due to prevention strategies failing to account for the influence of social determinants (such as ethnicity, socioeconomic status). Populations such as ethnic minorities have been over-represented in injury statistics, however this is not well explored in drowning. This study aims to identify high-risk populations for drowning, risk factors and prevention strategies.MethodsA lite… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
46
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
46
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although most of the bystander rescue fatality incidents involved Australian residents, Asian-born victims (particularly those born in China and India) were at proportionally higher risks of fatal bystander rescue incidents ( Table 2 ). Recently there has been increased attention regarding improving the understanding of water safety within culturally and linguistically diverse (CaLD) communities, who are often considered to be high-risk groups in terms of drowning [ 2 ]. Poor swimming ability, fewer opportunities to participate in water safety training (leading to less water safety skills), and less exposure to coastal hazards and environments (leading to lower risk perception) have previously been identified as key risk factors within Asian communities living in Australia [ 38 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although most of the bystander rescue fatality incidents involved Australian residents, Asian-born victims (particularly those born in China and India) were at proportionally higher risks of fatal bystander rescue incidents ( Table 2 ). Recently there has been increased attention regarding improving the understanding of water safety within culturally and linguistically diverse (CaLD) communities, who are often considered to be high-risk groups in terms of drowning [ 2 ]. Poor swimming ability, fewer opportunities to participate in water safety training (leading to less water safety skills), and less exposure to coastal hazards and environments (leading to lower risk perception) have previously been identified as key risk factors within Asian communities living in Australia [ 38 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With an estimated 360,000 annual drowning deaths worldwide, drowning is the third leading cause of unintentional injury death globally [ 1 ] and is also a multi-faceted and complex issue involving a range of social, cultural and environmental determinant factors [ 2 ]. The World Health Organisation [ 3 , 4 ] has identified six evidence-based interventions to approach the problem of drowning prevention, one of which is to ‘train bystanders in safe rescue and resuscitation’.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Philippines is a multicultural nation with many ethnic minorities. Such groups are shown to be at higher risk of drowning and have unique needs when it comes to reducing this risk [ 48 , 49 ]. Understanding the unique needs of these groups will be vital to ensuring the effective implementation of drowning prevention strategies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Language spoken at home is a proxy for immigrant status, a variable rarely collected. Many countries have reported increased drowning risk among their immigrant populations [ 26 ]. In fact, Canada has focused its drowning prevention program on its “new Canadians” which includes a linguistic approach [ 27 , 28 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%