2017
DOI: 10.1002/jso.24649
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying a subset of patients with DCIS who have a low likelihood of residual disease at surgical excision following a core needle biopsy

Abstract: Although our multivariable analysis performed well, its clinical utility would be limited as we were unable to identify a subset of patients with DCIS in whom the probability of finding no residual disease is low enough to consider routine use of non-surgical management.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…I want to congratulate Murphy and colleagues for their article in which they tried to investigate a subset of patients with DCIS who have a low likelihood of residual disease at surgical excision following a core needle biopsy. Many variables were included into analysis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I want to congratulate Murphy and colleagues for their article in which they tried to investigate a subset of patients with DCIS who have a low likelihood of residual disease at surgical excision following a core needle biopsy. Many variables were included into analysis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We appreciate the interest Dr Altundag has in our article and the discussion of the importance of human epidermal growth factor (HER2) positivity in patients with Ductal Carcinoma in Situ (DCIS) . As Dr Altundag mentioned, HER2 status was not evaluated in our study, as HER2 testing is not standard practice for DCIS outside of a clinical trial.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%