Lately, public shaming on internet based informal organizations and related web-based public gatherings, for example, Twitter has expanded. These events are known to appallingly affect the casualty's social, political, and monetary prosperity. Notwithstanding the undeniable unfortunate results, little has been finished to address this in well known web-based virtual entertainment, with the support that the enormous volume and variety of such comments requires an infeasible number of human arbitrators to finish the work. We mechanize the assignment of identifying public shaming by means of Twitter according to the point of view of casualties in this examination, zeroing in on two perspectives: occasions and shamers. Oppressive, correlation, condemning, strict/ethnic, mockery/joke, and whataboutery are the six kinds of disgraceful tweets, and each tweet is arranged into one of these classifications or as non-shaming. It has been shown that most of clients who post remarks in a shaming occasion are probably going to embarrass the person in question. Shockingly, shamers' Twitter adherent counts develop speedier than those of non-shamers. At last, utilizing AI methods, for example, Backing Vector Machine and Irregular Backwoods, a web application called block Disgrace was fabricated and carried out in light of the order and characterization ofshaming tweets for on-the-fly quieting/obstructing of shamers manhandling a casualty on Twitter.