Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Computational Linguistics - 2002
DOI: 10.3115/1072228.1072367
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying anaphoric and non-anaphoric noun phrases to improve coreference resolution

Abstract: We present a supervised learning approach to identification of anaphoric and non-anaphoric noun phrases and show how such information can be incorporated into a coreference resolution system. The resulting system outperforms the best MUC-6 and MUC-7 coreference resolution systems on the corresponding MUC coreference data sets, obtaining F-measures of 66.2 and 64.0, respectively.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
110
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
110
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Cast as an information status task, the goal of discourse-new mention detection is to find discourse referents which were not previously available to the hearer/reader; e.g., see the work of Nissim (2006). Ng and Cardie (2002) develop a discourse-new classifier that targets every kind of NP using a variety of feature types: lexical (string and head matching, conjunction), morpho-syntactic (definiteness, quantification, number), grammatical (appositional or copular context, modifier structure, proper-noun embedding), and shallow semantic (e.g., WordNet features). They incorporate the classifier into their coreference resolution system, pre-filtering NPs that are tagged as discoursenew.…”
Section: Discourse-new Mentionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cast as an information status task, the goal of discourse-new mention detection is to find discourse referents which were not previously available to the hearer/reader; e.g., see the work of Nissim (2006). Ng and Cardie (2002) develop a discourse-new classifier that targets every kind of NP using a variety of feature types: lexical (string and head matching, conjunction), morpho-syntactic (definiteness, quantification, number), grammatical (appositional or copular context, modifier structure, proper-noun embedding), and shallow semantic (e.g., WordNet features). They incorporate the classifier into their coreference resolution system, pre-filtering NPs that are tagged as discoursenew.…”
Section: Discourse-new Mentionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A related line of work aims to identify all noun phrases that have an antecedent in text, but these systems typically classify all pronouns as referential and ignore non-referential it [26,11].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Downing [7], Abbott [9] and Heim [10]) and computational linguistics (eg. Vieira et al [11], Ng et al [12] and Fraurud [13]). In this section we will examine verb as well as the adjective inflictions from the perspective or their effect on anaphoric properties.…”
Section: Nps Formed From Normalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%