“…As shown in Table 4, this literature is not equally developed across selected topic areas and remains sparse overall, representing just 8.2% of the farmworker health literature. (Gadon et al, 2001), California (Record, 1959), Connecticut (Townsend, 2020), North Carolina (Ciesielski et al, 1991), New York (Black; Chi, 1986), New York (Watson et al, 1985), Texas (Coles, 1965) Bracero and H2A Visa 17 North Carolina-H2A (Arcury et al, 2014;Arcury et al, 2015;Arcury et al, 2016;Grzywacz et al, 2007;Kraemer Diaz et al, 2016;Mirabelli et al, 2010;Quandt, Summers, et al, 2013;Robinson et al, 2011;Sandberg et al, 2016;Tribble et al, 2016;Vallejos et al, 2011;Whalley et al, 2009), United States-Bracero (Barrientos, 2015;McElroy & Gavett, 1965;Zárate, 2018) (Jacobson et al, 1987), Florida (Bolduc, 2018), North Carolina (Ciesielski et al, 1993), New York (Black and Haitian (Watson et al, 1985)) Indigenous 11 California (Mixteco/Zapoteco Maxwell, Young, Moe et al, 2018;Maxwell, Young, Rabelo Vega, et al, 2015), Mixteco (Young et al, 2019), from Oaxaca (Shen et al, 2018), Oregon-indigenous (Donlan & Lee, 2010;Farquhar et al, 2009; Regarding the use of technology to address farmworker health, we identified 11 records. Just two records addressed telehealth delivery for farmworkers (Norton et al, 1997;Price et al, 2013), and one addressed use of geographical information systems to infor...…”