2020
DOI: 10.1186/s12864-020-6752-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying branch-specific positive selection throughout the regulatory genome using an appropriate proxy neutral

Abstract: Background: Adaptive changes in cis-regulatory elements are an essential component of evolution by natural selection. Identifying adaptive and functional noncoding DNA elements throughout the genome is therefore crucial for understanding the relationship between phenotype and genotype. Results: We used ENCODE annotations to identify appropriate proxy neutral sequences and demonstrate that the conservativeness of the test can be modulated during the filtration of reference alignments. We applied the method to n… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, we searched for regions of possible positive selection within the genomes of six coronavirus species, including SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2. The method we used tests for an excess of branch-specific nucleotide substitutions within a defined window relative to a neutral expectation for divergence in that window and without regard to the genetic code (Wong & Nielsen, 2004; Haygood et al, 2007; Berrio, Haygood & Wray, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here, we searched for regions of possible positive selection within the genomes of six coronavirus species, including SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2. The method we used tests for an excess of branch-specific nucleotide substitutions within a defined window relative to a neutral expectation for divergence in that window and without regard to the genetic code (Wong & Nielsen, 2004; Haygood et al, 2007; Berrio, Haygood & Wray, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we utilize a test for positive selection that identifies an excess of nucleotide substitutions within a defined window in the genome relative to neutral expectation using a likelihood ratio framework (Wong & Nielsen, 2004; Haygood et al, 2007). We implemented this test using adaptiPhy (Berrio, Haygood & Wray, 2020) to infer regions of the genome that were likely targets of branch-specific positive selection in several Sarbecovirus species from bat, pangolin, and human hosts. Our results recapitulate results from dN/dS-based tests that highlight S , the gene encoding Spike protein, as a prominent target of natural selection within the SARS-CoV-2 genome (Cagliani et al, 2020; Chaw et al, 2020; Li et al, 2020a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A crucial feature contributing to the global spread of COVID-19 is that viral shedding starts before the onset of symptoms (He et al, 2020); in contrast, shedding began two to ten days after the onset of symptoms during the SARS epidemic of 2003 (Peiris et al, 2003;Pitzer, Leung & Lipsitch, 2007) Manuscript to be reviewed substitutions within a defined window relative to a neutral expectation for divergence in that window and without regard to the genetic code (Wong & Nielsen, 2004;Haygood et al, 2007;Berrio, Haygood & Wray, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the alternative model, all three types of evolution are permitted (neutral evolution, negative selection, and positive selection) in the foreground of the following topology: (((((SARS_CoV_2, Bat_CoV_RaTG13), Pa_CoV_Guangdong), Pa_CoV_Guangxi_P4L), (Bat_CoV_LYRa11, SARS_CoV)), Bat_CoV_BM48). This method is highly sensitive and specific and can differentiate between positive selection and relaxation of constraint (Berrio et al 2020). AdaptiPhy requires at least 3 kb reference alignment for each species that is used as a putatively neutral proxy for computing substitution rates.…”
Section: Testing For Positive Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation