2018
DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20170143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying Canadian patient-centred care measurement practices and quality indicators: a survey

Abstract: I n recent years, health care systems around the world have adopted patient-centred care as a model to improve quality of care. 1 A breadth of evidence has demonstrated that patient-centred care improves patient outcomes and experiences; 2-4 interactions and communication between patients, families and their health care providers; 5-12 and health care provider satisfaction. Further, patient-centred care has been shown to reduce health care utilization and costs while maintaining high-quality care. 13-15 The In… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although previously there were efforts to measure patient healthcare experience in the NWT, recently the territorial government began using online patient surveys to seek feedback related to satisfaction, treatment, preventative health, and safety[ 37 ]. This is an important step that can be complemented by methods such as in-depth interviews and focus groups to better capture diverse and nuanced patient experiences [ 20 ] which are more specific and fundamental to patient care in northern Indigenous contexts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although previously there were efforts to measure patient healthcare experience in the NWT, recently the territorial government began using online patient surveys to seek feedback related to satisfaction, treatment, preventative health, and safety[ 37 ]. This is an important step that can be complemented by methods such as in-depth interviews and focus groups to better capture diverse and nuanced patient experiences [ 20 ] which are more specific and fundamental to patient care in northern Indigenous contexts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In parallel to the scoping review, 19 an environmental scan was conducted to identify whether healthcare systems in Canada, the UK, Sweden, Australia and New Zealand were using PC-QIs, which PC-QIs were in use, and how they were implemented. 20 These countries were chosen as they shared many similarities with respect to healthcare delivery and structures. 20 Sixty-one existing indicators were identified.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 20 These countries were chosen as they shared many similarities with respect to healthcare delivery and structures. 20 Sixty-one existing indicators were identified. All unique PC-QIs identified through the scoping review and environmental scan were synthesised by the research team.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Patient-centred care quality metrics have, however, been elusive; though many indicators are described by health care organisations as informing practices, most are guidelines or recommendations under development and not actually implemented. 4,5 In this issue, Koopman et al 6 report a Canadian qualitative study of how patients with chronic disease shape the stories they tell health care providers. They argue that focusing on physician-patient encounters fails to consider the important and time-consuming, but invisible, preparatory work patients strategically perform on their overall health journeys between episodic encounters.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To operationalise this, focus has typically been on physician–patient encounters, with emphasis on physicians exploring patients' concerns, understanding patients as whole people, shared decision‐making, and physician–patient relationships 3 . Patient‐centred care quality metrics have, however, been elusive; though many indicators are described by health care organisations as informing practices, most are guidelines or recommendations under development and not actually implemented 4,5 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%