2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.08.02.22278319
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

identifying cancer patients from GC-patterned fragment ends of cell-free DNA

Abstract: One of the most intriguing characteristics of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from plasma is the sequence at the ends of the fragments. Previous studies have shown that these end-sequences are somewhat different in cancer patients than in healthy individuals. While investigating this characteristic, we noticed that the bases at the 5-prime ends of a double-stranded fragment were highly correlated with the GC content of that particular fragment. This led us to develop a method, called MendSeqS (Modified End-based sequenc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 42 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We wondered whether the reduced representation of AluS elements in the cfDNA from patients with cancer was the result of some unknown bias in amplification efficiency or sequencing generated from the RealSeqS approach, which used a single primer pair. To address this question, WGS data from our recently published study that included 65 cfDNA samples from individuals without cancer and 58 samples from patients with cancer were evaluated (55 colorectum, 2 lung, and 1 pancreas) (table S8) (33). Cancer samples had a global reduction of AluS representation compared with controls (P < 2.6 × 10 −5 , one-sided t test; Fig.…”
Section: Alu Subsetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We wondered whether the reduced representation of AluS elements in the cfDNA from patients with cancer was the result of some unknown bias in amplification efficiency or sequencing generated from the RealSeqS approach, which used a single primer pair. To address this question, WGS data from our recently published study that included 65 cfDNA samples from individuals without cancer and 58 samples from patients with cancer were evaluated (55 colorectum, 2 lung, and 1 pancreas) (table S8) (33). Cancer samples had a global reduction of AluS representation compared with controls (P < 2.6 × 10 −5 , one-sided t test; Fig.…”
Section: Alu Subsetsmentioning
confidence: 99%