Identifying cases of undiagnosed, clinically significant COPD in primary care: qualitative insight from patients in the target population

Abstract

Background:Many cases of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are diagnosed only after significant loss of lung function or during exacerbations.Aims:This study is part of a multi-method approach to develop a new screening instrument for identifying undiagnosed, clinically significant COPD in primary care.Methods:Subjects with varied histories of COPD diagnosis, risk factors and history of exacerbations were recruited through five US clinics (four pulmonary, one primary care). Phase I: Eight focus groups and six telephone interviews were conducted to elicit descriptions of risk factors for COPD, recent or historical acute respiratory events, and symptoms to inform the development of candidate items for the new questionnaire. Phase II: A new cohort of subjects participated in cognitive interviews to assess and modify candidate items. Two peak expiratory flow (PEF) devices (electronic, manual) were assessed for use in screening.Results:Of 77 subjects, 50 participated in Phase I and 27 in Phase II. Six themes informed item development: exposure (smoking, second-hand smoke); health history (family history of lung problems, recurrent chest infections); recent history of respiratory events (clinic visits, hospitalisations); symptoms (respiratory, non-respiratory); impact (activity limitations); and attribution (age, obesity). PEF devices were rated easy to use; electronic values were significantly higher than manual (P<0.0001). Revisions were made to the draft items on the basis of cognitive interviews.Conclusions:Forty-eight candidate items are ready for quantitative testing to select the best, smallest set of questions that, together with PEF, can efficiently identify patients in need of diagnostic evaluation for clinically significant COPD.

Insight into Best Variables for COPD Case Identification: A Random Forests Analysis

“…Results offer insight into the types of variables that should be considered in developing a new instrument for identifying undiagnosed cases of clinically significant COPD, complementing and extending results of the literature review 25 and qualitative research 26 . Existing screening measures cover some of the content identified here, to varying degrees.…”

“…The intent was to synthesize this information with insight from the literature 25 and qualitative research 26 to develop a pool of candidate items for a new screening questionnaire, ready for quantitative testing.…”

“…26 Specifically, each variable was assigned to 1 of 6 categories of variables that could be useful for identifying undiagnosed cases of COPD: exposure, personal health history, recent health history, respiratory symptoms, activity limitations, and demographics. These variables would be examined together with information from the literature and qualitative research to develop candidate items for the new questionnaire.…”

“…25 Qualitative focus groups were conducted to understand how patients describe risk factors and manifestations of COPD, in order to further inform questionnaire content. 26 …”

“…Results were used in conjunction with the literature review 25 and qualitative research 26 to develop a pool of candidate items for empirical testing.…”