2016 35th International Conference of the Chilean Computer Science Society (SCCC) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/sccc.2016.7835998
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying characteristics of Java methods that may influence branch coverage: An exploratory study on open source projects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• WMC: write more simple methods and invest in refactoring to get complex methods more simple. Experienced developers and testers know that methods and classes with complex logic are more difficult to test, and recent studies have been conducted to quantify the influence of characteristics of programs on the testing activity (de Castro et al, 2016). The more complex the method, the less lines of code are covered.…”
Section: Discussion and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• WMC: write more simple methods and invest in refactoring to get complex methods more simple. Experienced developers and testers know that methods and classes with complex logic are more difficult to test, and recent studies have been conducted to quantify the influence of characteristics of programs on the testing activity (de Castro et al, 2016). The more complex the method, the less lines of code are covered.…”
Section: Discussion and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Control flows reflect the interactive type and strength between components. Analysis based on control flow, such as complexity measurement [11], branch coverage testing [12] and defect prediction [13], manifests the performance of uncovering potential implications in software specification mining. Thus, more essence of software dynamic behaviors will be seen through more insights emerging in control patterns of software executions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%