2020
DOI: 10.1108/ejim-04-2020-0114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying contradictions in an incumbent–startup ecosystem–an activity theory approach

Abstract: PurposeDiscussion regarding systems that promote innovation, aptly named innovation ecosystems, has been intensifying both in academia and business. The purpose of this paper is to introduce the activity theory as a theoretical framework for conceptualising and studying innovation ecosystems. Using the activity theory, it investigates elements that affect the success and viability of innovation ecosystems formed between startups and incumbent firms, collaborating with an established firm within the context of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To explore the creation of SV within IEs, the paper relies on a thorough literature review of the articles published on this topic in the last 15 years. In these years, indeed, the concept of IEs, seen as key for value creation, has been widely adopted and studied (Baloutsos et al. , 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To explore the creation of SV within IEs, the paper relies on a thorough literature review of the articles published on this topic in the last 15 years. In these years, indeed, the concept of IEs, seen as key for value creation, has been widely adopted and studied (Baloutsos et al. , 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since its first formulation (Adner, 2006), the term Innovation ecosystem (IE) has been adopted to describe structures of interconnected entities, that, thanks to dynamic horizontal relations, support new grounding, exchange and strengthening of dispersed competences and resources to create innovations and value (Gomes et al, 2018;Jacobides et al, 2018;Russell and Smorodinskaya, 2018). The importance of such structures is growing (Bassis and Armellini, 2018;Baloutsos et al, 2020) due to a paradigm shift, that is moving the innovation processes outside the boundaries of a single organization (Moore, 1993;Chesbrough et al, 2006;Von Hippel, 2007;Usman and Vahnaverbeke, 2017), with the engagement and the collaboration of different entities (Schuh and Woelk, 2017;D'Auria et al, 2016;Russo-Spena et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Available literature suggested a positive link between team building activities and team cohesion for the case of a R&D startup. This was however the only documented case of team building activities used in a startup business that the researchers managed to find [2]. This therefore highlighted a research gap that the current paper aims to address.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Ever since their birth, Start-up businesses have managed to evade a well-established definition to characterize them. Some certainties regarding the delimitation of a Start-up business is that these types of business are driven by innovation [2] [3] [4], are often faced with a shortage of resources, lack formal structures and efficient decision-making processes [5]. A generally accepted definition for Start-ups is the one coined by Ries, according to whom, Start-ups develop new products and /or services under conditions of extreme uncertainty [6].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation