2021
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.684781
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying Critical States of Complex Diseases by Single-Sample Jensen-Shannon Divergence

Abstract: MotivationThe evolution of complex diseases can be modeled as a time-dependent nonlinear dynamic system, and its progression can be divided into three states, i.e., the normal state, the pre-disease state and the disease state. The sudden deterioration of the disease can be regarded as the state transition of the dynamic system at the critical state or pre-disease state. How to detect the critical state of an individual before the disease state based on single-sample data has attracted many researchers’ attent… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(56 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of the concepts and methodologies of the statistical mechanical description of phase transitions, like the state transition from a unimodal to a bimodal frequency distribution through a flattened unimodal profile (Figure 1) and the depiction of the state-transitions via potential landscapes and hysteresis curves (Figures 3 and 6), have made their appearance in recent studies on cancer. In such studies, cancer is interpreted in terms of a state-transition in the time series of transcriptome (gene expression) data with the transition points (bifurcation/phase transition points) identified as the points in state space at which dynamical regime shifts take place [17,28,34,40,41] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Some of the concepts and methodologies of the statistical mechanical description of phase transitions, like the state transition from a unimodal to a bimodal frequency distribution through a flattened unimodal profile (Figure 1) and the depiction of the state-transitions via potential landscapes and hysteresis curves (Figures 3 and 6), have made their appearance in recent studies on cancer. In such studies, cancer is interpreted in terms of a state-transition in the time series of transcriptome (gene expression) data with the transition points (bifurcation/phase transition points) identified as the points in state space at which dynamical regime shifts take place [17,28,34,40,41] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is, however, not a bonafide distance measure as it is not symmetric and does not satisfy the triangle inequality. The Jensen-Shannon divergence is defined to be [33,34] 𝐷 𝐽𝑆 (𝑃||𝑄) = 1 2 𝐷 𝐾𝐿 (𝑃||𝑀) + 1 2 𝐷 𝐾𝐿 (𝑄||𝑀), 𝑀 = 1 2 (𝑃 + 𝑄) (27) One can check that 𝐷 𝐽𝑆 (𝑃||𝑄) = 𝐷 𝐽𝑆 (𝑄||𝑃) (symmetry) and 0 ≤ 𝐷 𝐽𝑆 (𝑃||𝑄) ≤ 1. The zero (one) value indicates perfect (zero) overlap between the distributions.…”
Section: Quantitative Signatures Of the Onset Of Dominancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pair-wise proteomics divergences were quantified as the Jensen-Shannon divergence [66][67][68] . Groups of samples with similar proteomics were identified by hierarchical clustering using the sample-sample divergence matrix with the following parameters: Euclidean distance as the distance metric, average linkage clustering as the linkage selection method, and distance threshold = 3.…”
Section: Quantification Of Proteomics Divergences and Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Single-cell graph entropy (SGE) can explore the gene–gene associations among cell populations based on single-cell RNA sequencing data [ 6 ]. The single-sample-based Jensen–Shannon divergence (sJSD) method is used to detect the early-warning signals of complex diseases before critical transitions based on individual single-sample data [ 7 ]. The temporal network flow entropy (TNFE) method, which is based on network fluctuation of molecules, can detect the critical states of complex diseases on the basis of each individual [ 8 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%