Identifying Decisive Socio-Political Sustainability Barriers in the Supply Chain of Banking Sector in India: Causality Analysis Using ISM and MICMAC

Abstract

The banking sector often plays a crucial role in the improvement of infrastructure and economy of any country. In many emerging economies, it is apparent that a wide variety of social and political issues are related to the associated supply chain sustainability of financial service firms. Although such sustainability and its implementation issues have largely been addressed in existing research literature and in practice for many years, the attention towards socio-political sustainability aspects has been quite limited. Thus, this study attempted to explore the determinants for improving socio-political sustainability in financial service firms. Through adopting the fuzzy Delphi method (FDM), performing an exhaustive literature review, and conducting semi-structured interviews with the decision-makers of the service firms, nine key barriers for socio-political sustainability were first identified in this study. Then, the influence relationships of the key barriers were assessed by 15 experts. During the assessment process, the interrelationships and their dependence powers among key barriers were analyzed using the interpretive structural modelling (ISM) approach and cross-impact matrix multiplication applied to classification (MICMAC) methods. The assessment results show that among the studied barriers, “antisocial considerations”, “unstable political climate”, and “lack of political coherence” are the decisive barriers that affect the socio-political sustainability in the supply chain of financial service firms. The knowledge in understanding and reducing these decisive barriers can provide service sector practitioners, especially those with limited resources, the enhanced capability to conduct better planning and designing of effective and continuous improvement programs, so as to win over new consumers and retain existing clients by offering sustainable services.

Prioritization of the Best Sustainable Supply Chain Risk Management Practices Using a Structural Analysis Based-Approach

“…As for Troche-Escobar et al [39], they studied the SCRM in the Brazilian Wind Power Projects. Recently, Edgar et al [40] had proposed an investigation about the Andean region of Peru for managing risk in the agri-food supply chain while Chen, et al [41] identified decisive Socio-Political sustainability barriers in the supply chain of the banking sector in India.…”

Interrelationship Performance Indicators Model of Sustainable Procurement in Higher Education

“…Autonomous indicators are indicators that have a weak driving and dependence power, usually having a less significant impact on other indicators (Chen et al, 2021). There are eight indicators included in this cluster, among others indoor lighting choose energy-efficient lighting products (P4), assessment of suppliers with sustainability criteria (P3), food purchases and catering choose wrappers that are not disposable or choose easily biodegradable wrappers (P5), purchase a campus vehicle that is low in emissions (P6), purchasing paper chooses products from companies that do not have a reputation for illegal logging (P7), building materials for the renovation of campus buildings are chosen which are environmentally friendly (P9), selection of environmentally friendly furniture products (P10) and purchasing information technology equipment that saves electricity (P8 Dependence indicators have weak driving power but strong dependence power (Digalwar et al, 2017).…”

How Sustainability Is Defined: An Analysis of 100 Theoretical Approximations

“…Although the exact terminology varies from region to region [1], sustainability has the same underlying significance in all ambits. Today, ecological and social concerns are becoming increasingly important as everyday practices are increasingly regarded as unsustainable [2][3][4][5], leading to the emphasis on sustainability as the most effective alternative to the dominant developmental model. This model has been especially questioned and criticized for its role in the global ecological crisis and in the increase in global social inequalities.…”