2016
DOI: 10.3399/bjgp16x683461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying depression among adolescents using three key questions: a validation study in primary care

Abstract: Background

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The small number of studies included in this review and its small statistical test power might explain the lack of statistical significance between the effects of the subgroups. Clinical interviews are the gold standard in diagnosis of depression in adolescents (Haugen et al, 2016). At the same time, the sensitivity of most self-rating scales aiming to identify depression among adolescents is not above 75% (Salle et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The small number of studies included in this review and its small statistical test power might explain the lack of statistical significance between the effects of the subgroups. Clinical interviews are the gold standard in diagnosis of depression in adolescents (Haugen et al, 2016). At the same time, the sensitivity of most self-rating scales aiming to identify depression among adolescents is not above 75% (Salle et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, patients with bipolar disorders, eating disorders, psychotic disorders, and dementia might be incorrectly identified as having a major depressive episode (Inoue et al 2012). The wording and order of questions of the PHQ-9 were adapted for a modified version for teens (PHQ-9M) (Aggarwal et al 2017), and additional efforts focused on streamlining of the assessments for primary care environments (Richardson et al 2010;Haugen et al 2016). The PHQ-9 and the modified version are now widely used for adolescents in primary care and child and adolescent psychiatry clinics but without a full understanding of their psychometric properties (Richardson et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result may be related to the bias in the screening process of some subjects and the inclusion of some false positive samples. As we all know, clinical interview is the gold standard for the diagnosis of adolescent depression ( Haugen et al, 2016 ), while but the sensitivity of most self-rating scales for adolescent depression is less than 75% at present ( Salle et al, 2012 ). The difference in sensitivity between the two diagnostic methods means that a higher percentage of false positive samples will be screened out by the self-rating Depression Scale compared to structured clinical interviews.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%