2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.11.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying DOC gains and losses during a 20-year record in the Trout Beck catchment, Moor House, UK

Abstract: 10The turnover of organic carbon in rivers could represent a large source of greenhouse gases to the 11 atmosphere and studies have suggested that of the order of 70% of the dissolved organic carbon 12 exported from soils could lost in rivers before it flows to continental seas. The Environmental Change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, the annual mean concentration, 15.4 mg L −1 , was in the middle of the range of concentrations reported from boreal regions, from 1.5 to 35.3 mg L −1 (Yates et al, 2016;Avagyan et al, 2016). The DOC yield from our catchment was estimated at 4.7 g m −2 yr −1 , which was in the lower range of estimates reported for a permafrost region, which ranged from 1 to 35 g m −1 yr −1 (Fraser et al, 2001;Dinsmore et al, 2010;Moody et al, 2016). The mean DOC yield in our catchment was less than the net DOC loss reported from UK lands (2.1-11.5 g m −2 yr −1 ) (Moody et al, 2013), but it was higher than in Finnish rivers (3.5 g m −2 yr −1 ) (Räike et al, 2012), in the Yukon River in Alaska (1.4-3.7 g m −2 yr −1 ) and in central Siberian rivers (2.8-4.7 g m −2 yr −1 ) (Prokushkin et al, 2011).…”
Section: Doc Concentrations and Yieldmentioning
confidence: 40%
“…In our study, the annual mean concentration, 15.4 mg L −1 , was in the middle of the range of concentrations reported from boreal regions, from 1.5 to 35.3 mg L −1 (Yates et al, 2016;Avagyan et al, 2016). The DOC yield from our catchment was estimated at 4.7 g m −2 yr −1 , which was in the lower range of estimates reported for a permafrost region, which ranged from 1 to 35 g m −1 yr −1 (Fraser et al, 2001;Dinsmore et al, 2010;Moody et al, 2016). The mean DOC yield in our catchment was less than the net DOC loss reported from UK lands (2.1-11.5 g m −2 yr −1 ) (Moody et al, 2013), but it was higher than in Finnish rivers (3.5 g m −2 yr −1 ) (Räike et al, 2012), in the Yukon River in Alaska (1.4-3.7 g m −2 yr −1 ) and in central Siberian rivers (2.8-4.7 g m −2 yr −1 ) (Prokushkin et al, 2011).…”
Section: Doc Concentrations and Yieldmentioning
confidence: 40%
“…[] measured a removal rate of 35% across the catchment, and Moody et al . [] calculated a 10 year average loss rate across the catchment as 29% at an average in‐stream residence time of 4.33 h, i.e., lower removal rates than predicted by the approach above. Given the removal rate predicted for the DOC, then it may be that C:P does increase through the catchment, in which case it would imply that C:P ratio of DOM does increase through the catchment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study, the annual mean concentration, 15.4 mg L −1 , was in the middle of the range of concentrations reported from boreal regions, from 1.5 to 35.3 mg L −1 (Yates et al, 2016;Avagyan et al, 2016). The DOC yield from our catchment was estimated at 4.7 g m −2 yr −1 , which was in the lower range of estimates reported for a permafrost region, which ranged from 1 to 35 g m −1 yr −1 (Fraser et al, 2001;Dinsmore et al, 2010;Moody et al, 2016). The mean DOC yield in our catchment was less than the net DOC loss reported from UK lands (2.1-11.5 g m −2 yr −1 ) (Moody et al, 2013), but it was higher than in Finnish rivers (3.5 g m −2 yr −1 ) (Räike et al, 2012), in the Yukon River in Alaska (1.4-3.7 g m −2 yr −1 ) (Striegl et al, 2007) and in central Siberian rivers (2.8-4.7 g m −2 yr −1 ) (Prokushkin et al, 2011).…”
Section: Doc Concentrations and Yieldmentioning
confidence: 44%