2004
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.92.233601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying Entanglement Using Quantum Ghost Interference and Imaging

Abstract: We report a quantum interference and imaging experiment which quantitatively demonstrates that Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) type entangled two-photon states exhibit both momentummomentum and position-position correlations, stronger than any classical correlation. The measurements show indeed that the uncertainties in the sum of momenta and in the difference of positions of the entangled two-photon satisfy both EPR inequalities ∆(k1 + k2) < min(∆k1, ∆k2) and ∆(x1 − x2) < min(∆x1, ∆x2). These two inequalities, … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

3
153
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 184 publications
(157 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
153
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, to identify the difference between the pattern produced by quantum correlated photons and that by classically correlated beams in the case of ghost interference experiments, more detailed discussion is required as reported in Ref. [28,29]. On the other hand, the difference clearly appears in the case of the experiment in which two photons pass through the same object, that is, R (1) A (q) = R (1) B (q) in Eq.…”
Section: Fourier-optical Analysis Of a Two-photon Statementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, to identify the difference between the pattern produced by quantum correlated photons and that by classically correlated beams in the case of ghost interference experiments, more detailed discussion is required as reported in Ref. [28,29]. On the other hand, the difference clearly appears in the case of the experiment in which two photons pass through the same object, that is, R (1) A (q) = R (1) B (q) in Eq.…”
Section: Fourier-optical Analysis Of a Two-photon Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…11(b)). Recently, several groups have reported coincidence imaging experiments using classical light sources, which stimulated discussion regarding the difference between quantum and classical coincidence imaging [21,27,28,29,30]. Two types of experiment use classical light sources.…”
Section: Fourier-optical Analysis Of a Two-photon Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5] and demonstrated in Ref. [14,15]. The position-momentum uncertainty relation can be in-vestigated with the single-slit diffraction experiment involving a quantum object [12,13] and it has been demonstrated experimentally for neutrons [16] and for large fullerene molecules [17].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genuine EPR position-momentum entanglement of photon pairs became available later by the SPDC process in a bulk crystal [14,15] and is thought to be essential in quantum imaging and quantum metrology [16][17][18][19]. The EPR-entangled SPDC photons, however, are inherently broadband, typically on the order of several THz in bandwidth.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gedankenexperiment proposed by Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) in 1935, on the other hand, involves a pair of particles that are entangled in their positions and momenta [13][14][15]. In addition to fundamental interests, EPR entanglement is essential in quantum imaging and quantum metrology [16][17][18][19].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%