2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying eolian dust in the geological record

Abstract: This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 202 publications
(374 reference statements)
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, these deposits are not classified as lithified loess (Pye, 1995), but rather interpreted as a diverse depositional environment containing a loess‐like component as well as other fluvio‐lacustrine and/or dust components (Figure 7). This interpretation is in line with recent depositional models for the Miocene Red Clay (Alonso‐Zarza et al., 2009; Liu et al., 2019; Meijer et al., 2020).…”
Section: Grain‐size Analysissupporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, these deposits are not classified as lithified loess (Pye, 1995), but rather interpreted as a diverse depositional environment containing a loess‐like component as well as other fluvio‐lacustrine and/or dust components (Figure 7). This interpretation is in line with recent depositional models for the Miocene Red Clay (Alonso‐Zarza et al., 2009; Liu et al., 2019; Meijer et al., 2020).…”
Section: Grain‐size Analysissupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This suggests a reduction in fluvial activity rather than an increase at 40 Ma as observed in EM4. We note that the observations listed above, when considered on their own, are not strictly diagnostic of windblown transport (Meijer et al, 2020), but argue that when taken together, these observations suggest an eolian origin as the most likely. We therefore interpret the increase of EM4 as the onset of a loess-like dust component, which remains a consistent part of the sedimentary record afterward.…”
Section: End-member Interpretationsmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2), there are many stages associated with particle formation, mobilization, transport, deposition, re-mobilization, and re-deposition that may have been involved 43 . The formation of dust deposits requires a source of dust, adequate wind energy to entrain and transport the dust to the terrestrial deposition site, and conditions that favor trapping and preservation of the dust at that site 3,44,45 . The co-variation among chemical weathering proxies (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%