Identifying Eukaryotes and Factors Influencing Their Biogeography in Drinking Water Metagenomes

Abstract

The biogeography of eukaryotes in drinking water systems is poorly understood relative to that of prokaryotes or viruses, limiting the understanding of their role and management. A challenge with studying complex eukaryotic communities is that metagenomic analysis workflows are currently not as mature as those that focus on prokaryotes or viruses. In this study, we benchmarked different strategies to recover eukaryotic sequences and genomes from metagenomic data and applied the bestperforming workflow to explore the factors affecting the relative abundance and diversity of eukaryotic communities in drinking water distribution systems (DWDSs). We developed an ensemble approach exploiting k-mer-and reference-based strategies to improve eukaryotic sequence identification and identified Meta-BAT2 as the best-performing binning approach for their clustering. Applying this workflow to the DWDS metagenomes showed that eukaryotic sequences typically constituted small proportions (i.e., <1%) of the overall metagenomic data with higher relative abundances in surface water-fed or chlorinated systems with high residuals. The α and β diversities of eukaryotes were correlated with those of prokaryotic and viral communities, highlighting the common role of environmental/management factors. Finally, a cooccurrence analysis highlighted clusters of eukaryotes whose members' presence and abundance in DWDSs were affected by disinfection strategies, climate conditions, and source water types.

New drinking water genome catalog identifies a globally distributed bacterial genus adapted to disinfected drinking water systems

“…The low representativeness of the DWGC for non-disinfected systems suggests that additional effort is required to populate the DWGC with genomes from these systems. It is important to note that non-disinfected systems are significantly more diverse as compared to disinfected systems 3,4,11,13,14 and thus ensuring a DWGC representative for non-disinfected systems will be challenging.…”

“…The drinking water microbiome 1 is a diverse collection of bacteria and archaea 2 , eukaryotes 3 , and viruses 4 and varies in composition spatially and temporally 5,6 from source to tap 7 . Considering the myriad ways in which biological activity in drinking water infrastructure – from treatment to distribution and in the built environment – can affect the safety and aesthetic quality of drinking water 8,9 , understanding the structure and function of the drinking water microbiome is critical.…”

Legionella relative abundance in shower hose biofilms is associated with specific microbiome members

“…In response, specific databases have been developed for certain fractions of eukaryotes of interest to the exclusion of others (Guillou et al 2013 ). A further major drawback is that the taxonomic identification of eukaryotes is still limited and this calls for improvements in all aspects of eukaryotes ecology research, from targeted sample collection to dedicated analysis pipelines (Gabrielli et al 2023 ).…”

Responses of drinking water bulk and biofilm microbiota to elevated water age in bench-scale simulated distribution systems

“…Although there are increasing studies in this research area, studies focused specifically on drinking water microbiomes are still fragmentary 20 . Surprisingly, little information is available about eukaryotic communities in drinking water, although there has been a recent push to include eukaryotes and construct eukaryotic MAGs in metagenomic analysis 14 , 21 , 22 . Further studies into microbial communities will lend insight into when and why problematic microbiota proliferate in water systems and how to control their growth.…”