Proceedings of the 11th ACM International Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Health Informatics 2020
DOI: 10.1145/3388440.3412416
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying Evolutionary Origins of Repeat Domains in Protein Families

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other models have considered horizontal transfers, merges/splits and shuffling events, but again with each duplication consisting of a single domain ( Hallett et al , 2004 ; Stolzer et al , 2015 ; Yi-Chieh et al , 2012 ). In contrast, Aluru and Singh (2020 ) and Dondi et al (2019 ) consider reconcilations where single duplication events can consist of multiple units (e.g. domains or sequences), but they do not consider the positional information of these units and thus these duplications are not constrained to be tandem duplications; these formulations, which we term as Concurrent Duplication Loss (CDL) reconciliations, can be defined using all conditions except Condition 3c from Definition 1, and with no eligibility matrix as input.…”
Section: The Tdl Reconciliation Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Other models have considered horizontal transfers, merges/splits and shuffling events, but again with each duplication consisting of a single domain ( Hallett et al , 2004 ; Stolzer et al , 2015 ; Yi-Chieh et al , 2012 ). In contrast, Aluru and Singh (2020 ) and Dondi et al (2019 ) consider reconcilations where single duplication events can consist of multiple units (e.g. domains or sequences), but they do not consider the positional information of these units and thus these duplications are not constrained to be tandem duplications; these formulations, which we term as Concurrent Duplication Loss (CDL) reconciliations, can be defined using all conditions except Condition 3c from Definition 1, and with no eligibility matrix as input.…”
Section: The Tdl Reconciliation Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Dondi et al (2019 ), a maximum parsimony approach with fixed duplication and loss costs is used, it is shown that the CDL reconciliation problem is NP-complete, and a fixed-parameter tractable algorithm (along with its implementation MultRec) is given. In Aluru and Singh (2020 ), more general duplication cost functions based on duplication size are considered, and an ILP solution is given. While these previous models did not explicitly consider tandem duplications, a key insight of our work is that we can define TDL reconciliations with a simple adaptation of the definition of CDL reconciliations ( Aluru and Singh, 2020 ; Dondi et al , 2019 ) with the use of an eligibility matrix, which specifies which domain pairs can be part of the same tandem duplication.…”
Section: The Tdl Reconciliation Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations