2020
DOI: 10.1109/tse.2018.2844259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying Failure-Causing Schemas in the Presence of Multiple Faults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The masking effect [19] may also make the failure-observation difficult, as other failures may be triggered, which may prevent the discovery of the remaining failures. Our previous studies [22], [24] discussed the problem and some related consequences caused if this assumption does not hold.…”
Section: Faulty and Healthymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The masking effect [19] may also make the failure-observation difficult, as other failures may be triggered, which may prevent the discovery of the remaining failures. Our previous studies [22], [24] discussed the problem and some related consequences caused if this assumption does not hold.…”
Section: Faulty and Healthymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the improvement is not free: it needs to list every possible schema in a test case, which is not possible when the number of parameters in a test case is large. We [24] later discussed the problem of identifying the MFS in the presence of multiple faults, especially when there exist masking effects among them. In [22], we proposed an interleaving framework for MFS identification such that the process of MFS identification can be more efficient and effective.…”
Section: Adaptive Classmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Type of Oracles Problems [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18] manual-based oracles error-pone and labor-intensive [2], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23] implicit test oracles limited faulty types and testing scenarios [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29] specified oracles requiring of full specification and heavy reliance on the test expertise [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35] correct version as oracles the existence of a correct version may not hold in CT, including so-called implicit test oracles [12] which can be directly observed by the behaviors of the SUT, like crashes [2], exceptions [19], memory leaks [20], buffer overflow [22]. When the full specification of the SUT is available, embedded assertions [24] or pre and post conditions [25] or a model-checker [26], [27] can also be utilized as the so-called specified oracles for the CT test cases.…”
Section: Referencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem is how to locate the combination that causes a failure when a fault is discovered [159,160]. Indeed, in case of failure, there is a masking effect among the interactions [159] that makes hard the precise localization of the right combination.…”
Section: Mixtgte: Efficient and Guaranteed Detection Of T-way Failure-inducing Combinationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem is how to locate the combination that causes a failure when a fault is discovered [159,160]. Indeed, in case of failure, there is a masking effect among the interactions [159] that makes hard the precise localization of the right combination. In order to avoid this masking effect, new tests are needed besides those necessary to cover all the interactions as required by CIT.…”
Section: Mixtgte: Efficient and Guaranteed Detection Of T-way Failure-inducing Combinationsmentioning
confidence: 99%