2006
DOI: 10.37236/1104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying Graph Automorphisms Using Determining Sets

Abstract: A set of vertices $S$ is a determining set for a graph $G$ if every automorphism of $G$ is uniquely determined by its action on $S$. The determining number of a graph is the size of a smallest determining set. This paper describes ways of finding and verifying determining sets, gives natural lower bounds on the determining number, and shows how to use orbits to investigate determining sets. Further, determining sets of Kneser graphs are extensively studied, sharp bounds for their determining numbers are prov… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
95
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
95
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The equivalent problem of finding the determining numbers of Kneser graphs has been considered more recently, starting in the 2006 paper of Boutin [19], and continued in the recent work of Cáceres et al [27]. Their methods and results are very similar to Maund's, although were obtained independently, and are expressed in the language of graphs and hypergraphs.…”
Section: The Symmetric Group Johnson and Kneser Graphs And The Greementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The equivalent problem of finding the determining numbers of Kneser graphs has been considered more recently, starting in the 2006 paper of Boutin [19], and continued in the recent work of Cáceres et al [27]. Their methods and results are very similar to Maund's, although were obtained independently, and are expressed in the language of graphs and hypergraphs.…”
Section: The Symmetric Group Johnson and Kneser Graphs And The Greementioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, can the gap between the two parameters be made arbitrarily large? This question is asked by Boutin [19] and (implicitly) by Vince [93], while the paper by Cáceres et al [28] is devoted to investigating it. In the same vein, we can ask: for which graphs are the two parameters equal?…”
Section: The Dimension Jumpmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Equivalently, S is a fixing set of the graph G if whenever g ∈ Aut(G) fixes every vertex in S, g is the identity automorphism. A set of vertices S is a determining set of G if whenever two automorphisms g, h ∈ Aut(G) agree on S, then they agree on G, i.e., they are the same automorphism [3]. The following lemma shows that these two definitions are equivalent.…”
Section: Fixing Graphsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…They have also given a comparison between the distinguishing number and the distinguishing index for a connected graph G of order n ≥ 3. Boutin [7] introduced the concept of determining sets. In [4], Albertson and Boutin proved that a graph is t-distinguishable if and only if it has a determining set that is (t − 1)distinguishable.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%